๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Fulvestrant versus anastrozole for the treatment of advanced breast carcinoma in postmenopausal women : A prospective combined analysis of two multicenter trials

โœ Scribed by John F. R. Robertson; C. Kent Osborne; Anthony Howell; Stephen E. Jones; Louis Mauriac; Matthew Ellis; Ulrich R. Kleeberg; Steven E. Come; Ignace Vergote; Stan Gertler; Aman Buzdar; Alan Webster; Charles Morris


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
119 KB
Volume
98
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fulvestrant (ICI 182,780) is a new type of estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist that downโ€regulates the ER and has no known agonist effects. The authors report the prospectively planned combined analysis of data from 2 Phase III trials comparing fulvestrant 250 mg monthly (n = 428) and anastrozole 1 mg daily (n = 423) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma (ABC) who previously had progressed after receiving endocrine treatment.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints included objective response (OR), duration of response (DOR), and tolerability. The trials were designed to demonstrate superiority of fulvestrant over anastrozole. Noninferiority of fulvestrant versus anastrozole was determined using a retrospectively applied statistical test.

RESULTS

At a median followโ€up of 15.1 months, โ‰ˆ 83% of patients in each treatment arm had progressed. The median TTP was 5.5 months in the fulvestrant group and 4.1 months in the anastrozole group, and the OR rates were 19.2% and 16.5% for fulvestrant and anastrozole, respectively (although the difference between treatments was not statistically significant). In patients who responded, further followโ€up (median, 22.1 months) was performed to obtain more complete information on DOR; the median DOR (from randomization to disease progression) in patients who responded to treatment was 16.7 months in the fulvestrant group and 13.7 months in the anastrozole group. In a statistical analysis of DOR (using all randomized patients; from the start of response to disease progression), DOR was significantly longer for patients in the fulvestrant group compared with patients in the anastrozole group. Both drugs were tolerated well; withdrawals due to drugโ€related adverse events were 0.9% and 1.2% in the fulvestrant group and the anastrozole group, respectively. The incidence of joint disorders was significantly lower in the fulvestrant group (P = 0.0036).

CONCLUSIONS

Fulvestrant was tolerated well and was at least as effective as anastrozole in the secondโ€line treatment of patients with ABC. This new hormonaltherapy may provide a valuable treatment option for ABC in postmenopausal women. Cancer 2003;98:229โ€“38. ยฉ 2003 American Cancer Society.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Anastrozole versus megestrol acetate in
โœ Aman U. Buzdar; Walter Jonat; Anthony Howell; Stephen E. Jones; Carl P. Blomqvis ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 146 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Medical University of BACKGROUND. This report presents the results of a survival update based on the combined data from two studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (1 or 10 mg once daily), a selective, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor administered orally, and megestrol ace

Anastrozole alone or in combination with
โœ The ATAC (Arimidex; Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) Trialists' Group ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2003 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 120 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND The first analysis of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination) trial (median followโ€up, 33 months) demonstrated that in adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal patients with earlyโ€stage breast cancer, anastrozole was superior to tamoxifen in terms of d

A prospective, randomized phase III tria
โœ Cesar Blajman; L. Balbiani; J. Block; F. Coppola; R. Chacon; L. Fein; S. Bonicat ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 105 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

## Background: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, phase iii trial comparing the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (fac) with a combination of vinorelbine and doxorubicin (na) in the treatment of patients with advanced breast carcinoma w