✦ LIBER ✦

Full-field and hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials in the evaluation of pituitary tumours

✍ Scribed by M. Rakowicz; J. Wisłaski; E. Szikiła̧dź; T. Bacia

Book ID: 115868813
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1990
Tongue: English
Weight: 118 KB
Volume: 75
Category: Article
ISSN: 0013-4694
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(90)92170-2

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoke

Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. II. Lesions of the chiasm and posterior visual pathways

✍ Itzhak C Haimovic; Timothy A Pedley 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 642 KB

A comparison of multifocal visual evoked

A comparison of multifocal visual evoked potentials with conventional full-field pattern reversal stimulation

✍ A. Klistorner; C. Yiannikas; R. Garrick; C. Fraser; H. Arvind 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 36 KB

The clinical utility of half-field patte

The clinical utility of half-field pattern reversal visual evoked potential testing

✍ M John Rowe III 📂 Article 📅 1982 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 347 KB

Variability on serial testing of pattern

Variability on serial testing of pattern reversal visual evoked potential latencies from full-field, half-field and foveal stimulation in control subjects

✍ S.R Hammond; S MacCallum; C Yiannikas; J.C Walsh; J.G McLeod 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 537 KB

Effects of check size on pattern reversa

Effects of check size on pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic field and potential

✍ Miho Nakamura; Ryusuke Kakigi; Tomohiro Okusa; Minoru Hoshiyama; Kazuyoshi Watan 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 935 KB

Effect of stimulus field size and locali

Effect of stimulus field size and localization on the binocular pattern reversal visual evoked response

✍ Osamu Katsumi; Tatsuo Hirose; Tsuyoshi Tanino 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 574 KB

The role of the central and peripheral stimulus fields on monocular and binocular amplitude and binocular summation of the pattern reversal visual evoked response were investigated. When the central stimulus field size was smaller than 2.4 degrees, there was no significant difference between the amp