𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Frequency-Dependent Streaming Potentials

✍ Scribed by Philip M. Reppert; Frank Dale Morgan; David P. Lesmes; Laurence Jouniaux


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
123 KB
Volume
234
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9797

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


An experimental apparatus and data acquisition system was constructed to measure the streaming potential coupling coefficients as a function of frequency. The purpose of the experiments was to measure, for the first time, the real and imaginary portion of streaming potentials. In addition, the measured frequency range was extended beyond any previous measurements. Frequency-dependent streaming potential experiments were conducted on one glass capillary and two porous glass filters. The sample pore diameters ranged from 1 mm to 34 Β΅m. Two frequency-dependent models (Packard and Pride) were compared to the data. Both Pride's and Packard's models have a good fit to the experimental data in the low- and intermediate-frequency regime. In the high-frequency regime, the data fit the theory after being corrected for capacitance effects of the experimental setup. Pride's generalized model appears to have the ability to more accurately estimate pore sizes in the porous medium samples. Packard's model has one unknown model parameter while Pride's model has four unknown model parameters, two of which can be independently determined experimentally. Pride's additional parameters may allow for a determination of permeability. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Measurement of streaming potentials
✍ G.K Korpi; P.L de Bruyn πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1972 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 315 KB
Frequency-dependent conduction delay of
✍ JΓΈrgen FeldbΓ¦K Nielsen πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 201 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Paired transcranial magnetic stimulation was applied in 33 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and in 21 healthy controls. A major abnormality was found in latency of the second motor-evoked potential in MS patients. At interstimulus intervals of 75, 100, and 150 ms the central motor conduction time (C