✦ LIBER ✦

Free will, the self, and the brain

✍ Scribed by Gilberto Gomes

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 133 KB
Volume: 25
Category: Article
ISSN: 0735-3936
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.754

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Free will, determinism, and criminality:

Free will, determinism, and criminality: The self-perception of prison inmates

✍ Fred Holbert; N.Prabha Unnithan 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 938 KB

Self and non-self in the brain

✍ J.L. Darling; N.R. Hoyle; D.G.T. Thomas 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 580 KB

The neuroscience of “free will”

✍ Laurence R. Tancredi 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 145 KB

The Illusion of Free Will

✍ I M Probulos 📂 Fiction 📅 2013 🌐 English ⚖ 87 KB 👁 1 views

The problem of free will : a brief introduction and outline of position -- Against libertarianism -- Against compatibilism -- Consciousness and free will (I) : automaticity and the adaptive unconscious -- Consciousness and free will (II) : transparency, infallibility, and the higher-order thought th

Natural evil and the Free Will Defense

✍ Paul K. Moser 📂 Article 📅 1984 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 471 KB

Recently Richard Swinburne has argued that the well-known Free Will Defense can provide an explanation of God's permitting moral evil (i.e., evil intentionally brought about by human agents) only if there is also natural evil (i.e., evil not intentionally brought about by human agents). 1 Ultimately

The free will defence and natural evil

✍ Michael J. Coughlan 📂 Article 📅 1986 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 790 KB

Does the granting of free will demand not only that moral evil must be possible, but also that natural evil exist? A positive answer to this question has been offered by Richard Swinburne, who has argued that an agent cannot have free will (in the relevant moral sense) without knowledge of how to br