๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Forty-two years of peripheral nerve surgery

โœ Scribed by Prof. Dr. Hanno Millesi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
675 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0738-1085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


YICROSURQERY 1 4 -1983

w h e n I started my surgical training in 195 1. surgery of peripheral nerves seemed to have reached a peak, that was hardly to be surpassed. The vast experience of World War I1 had been studied carefully in Great Britain, in Australia, and in the United States. However, many surgeons looked at the problem too optimistically. They did not really follow the cases, and they were pleased if any recovery could be detected after nerve repair, because they were convinced that with time the results would become better and would reach normal or nearly normal values. Sensibility was not regarded as important. It was the great merit of Eric Moberg to recognise the importance of sensibility and tactile gnosis.' He demonstrated that, except in children, useful sensibility did not return. This stimulated a whole generation of surgeons to think about the problem. Since then, many thiigs have changed, new techniques have been developed, and certainly an improvement has been achieved. In spite of this fact, many questions remain unanswered, and the results are far from being fully satisfactory. If I look back at the past 42 years, peripheral nerve surgery has run through three different phases, the mechanical phase, the biological phase, and the phase of neurotrophism.

MECHANICAL PHASE

Trunk-to-trunk coaptation using epineurial sutures with exact coaptation of the stumps of a transected nerve trunk, using external landmarks to avoid malrotation, was the technique of choice. Perineurial (fascicular) repair, as suggested by Langley and Hashimoto,' did not become popular. In the case of large nerve defects, the two stumps were vastly mobilized and coapted, using maximal flexion of the adjacent joints. Defects between 10 and 23 cm were managed by this technique with belief that there would be rec o v e r ~. ~ This so-called critical resection length went down with the years and reached 3-7 cm with Sir Sydney Sun-derland4 and 4-10 cm with Braun.' It is interesting to note From the oeperbnent of Plastic and ReumtwWe Surgery, 1st Surgical Clinic, University of Vienna Medical School. and Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental plastic surgery, Vienna, AusMa.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Factors affecting the outcome of periphe
โœ Hanno Millesi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2006 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 582 KB

## Abstract Over the last 40 years, various factors that influence the outcome of peripheral nerve surgery have been recognized. Some of these factors, such as age of the patient and time interval between injury and surgery, cannot be controlled by the surgeon. On the other hand, other factors rela

Nerve regeneration through a healthy per
โœ Fuat Yรผksel; Ersiฬ‡n รœlkรผr; Hรผseyiฬ‡n BaloฤŸlu; Bahattiฬ‡n ร‡eliฬ‡kรถz ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 210 KB

The popularity of nerve conduits has increased recently due to the need for alternative nerve reconstruction techniques, obviating the harvest of nerve grafts. Based on ideas suggesting nerve tissue itself, which was the most physiologic environment for nerve regeneration, a study using 40 sciatic n

Microsurgical treatment of injury to per
โœ A. Portincasa; G. Gozzo; D. Parisi; L. Annacontini; A. Campanale; G. Basso; A. M ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2007 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 560 KB

Nerve injuries to the upper and inferior limbs represent a common event due both to home and working accidents. Minor traumas can lead to severe disabilities if a wrong treatment is carried out. From 1997 to 2005, 920 patients were observed with a total of 1,200 major or minor nerves injuries operat