๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Formation of the giant planets

โœ Scribed by D.J. Stevenson


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1982
Tongue
English
Weight
1014 KB
Volume
30
Category
Article
ISSN
0032-0633

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Photoevaporation of the Solar Nebula and
โœ Frank H. Shu; Doug Johnstone; David Hollenbach ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 611 KB

We review the prevailing theories for the formation of the jovian planets and comment that they do not provide a natural explanation for the oft-noted subdivision into two separate classes: the gas-rich giants, Jupiter and Saturn, and the gas-poor giants, Uranus and Neptune. To account for the obser

Formation of the Giant Planets by Concur
โœ James B. Pollack; Olenka Hubickyj; Peter Bodenheimer; Jack J. Lissauer; Morris P ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 508 KB

boundary, which depends on the planet's total mass. The overall evolutionary time scale is generally determined by the length New numerical simulations of the formation of the giant of the second phase. planets are presented, in which for the first time both the gas and The actual rates at which th

Models of the in Situ Formation of Detec
โœ Peter Bodenheimer; Olenka Hubickyj; Jack J. Lissauer ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 138 KB

We present numerical simulations of the formation of the planetary companions to 47 UMa, ฯ CrB, and 51 Peg. They are assumed to have formed in situ according to the basic model that a core formed first by accretion of solid particles, then later it captured substantial amounts of gas from the protop

Terrestrial Planet and Asteroid Formatio
โœ Stephen J. Kortenkamp; George W. Wetherill ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 442 KB

We investigate the orbital evolution of 10 13 -to 10 25 -g planetesimals near 1 AU and in the asteroid belt (near 2.6 AU) prior to the stage of evolution when the mutual perturbations between the planetesimals become important. We include nebular gas drag and the effects of Jupiter and Saturn at the

Rapid Formation of Ice Giant Planets
โœ Alan P. Boss; George W. Wetherill; Nader Haghighipour ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 94 KB

The existence of Uranus and Neptune presents severe difficulties for the core accretion model for the formation of ice giant planets. We suggest an alternative mechanism, namely disk instability leading to the formation of gas giant protoplanets, coagulation and settling of dust grains to form ice-r

Love numbers of the giant planets
โœ S.V. Gavrilov; V.N. Zharkov ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1977 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 317 KB