## Abstract Several formulations of the Boundary Element Method (BEM) are examined herein in the context of heterogeneous media. A strong singularity develops at reβentrant interzonal corners and its effect is made more acute by large differences in the material properties. The effects of this sing
β¦ LIBER β¦
Formal equivalence of direct and indirect boundary element methods
β Scribed by C.A. Brebbia; R. Butterfield
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1978
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 216 KB
- Volume
- 2
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0307-904X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Boundary elements in zoned media: Direct
β
Daniel E. Medina; Meng H. Lean; James A. Liggett
π
Article
π
1990
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 585 KB
Equivalence and convergence of direct an
β
G. Tsamasphyros; P. S. Theocaris
π
Article
π
1981
π
Springer Vienna
π
English
β 457 KB
A note on indirect boundary element meth
β
S. Sharp
π
Article
π
1983
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 157 KB
π 1 views
A comparison of equivalence and finite e
β
E. Absi; W. Prager
π
Article
π
1975
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 389 KB
Elastodynamic direct boundary element me
β
B. Birgisson; E. Siebrits; A. P. Peirce
π
Article
π
1999
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 172 KB
π 2 views
Evidence of numerical instabilities in two-dimensional time domain direct boundary element methods is presented. The e!ects of numerical versus analytical integration of spatial integrals on stability are shown, and two new time-stepping algorithms are introduced and compared to existing formulation
Dynamic-stiffness matrix of embedded and
β
John P. Wolf; Georges R. Darbre
π
Article
π
1984
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 649 KB