𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Foreign body contamination during stent implantation

✍ Scribed by Whelan, D. M. ;van Beusekom, H. M. M. ;van der Giessen, W. J.


Book ID
101241345
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1997
Tongue
English
Weight
317 KB
Volume
40
Category
Article
ISSN
0098-6569

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The treatment of coronary artery disease using stents has become a widely accepted technique. However, the inadvertent co-implantation of contaminating factors with the stent has received little attention. We studied histological cross-sections of stented porcine coronary arteries and observed contamination of some vessels with surgical glove powder and textile fibres. The contaminating particles were associated with a foreign body reaction. Such a reaction could delay the wound-healing response of a stented vessel and thereby prolong the period in which subacute thrombosis could occur. It is also proposed that air contamination could affect the thrombogenicity of the stent. Appropriate measures should be followed to reduce the chance of contamination occurring.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Factitious foreign body implantations
✍ Mark Swerdloff; Stanley A. Alexander πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 291 KB
Foreign parts [electronic body implants]
✍ Evans-Pughe, C. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› The Institution of Electrical Engineers 🌐 English βš– 520 KB
Foreign body reaction after cochlear imp
✍ Hye Jin Lim; Eun-So Lee; Hun Yi Park; Keehyun Park; Yun-Hoon Choung πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 397 KB
Implant contamination during spine surge
✍ Bible, Jesse E.; O’Neill, Kevin R.; Crosby, Colin G.; Schoenecker, Jonathan G.; πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2013 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 101 KB
Sample contamination caused by sputterin
✍ PLF Hemment πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1979 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 315 KB

Data is presented which shows that both forward and back sputtering can be the cause of heavy metal surface contamination of samples during ion implantation. Rutherford backscattering is used to show that contamination levels can be in excess of 1 and 0.02% of the implanted dose for forward and back