𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Forecasting high-frequency financial data with the ARFIMA–ARCH model

✍ Scribed by Michael A. Hauser; Robert M. Kunst


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
168 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0277-6693

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Financial data series are often described as exhibiting two non‐standard time series features. First, variance often changes over time, with alternating phases of high and low volatility. Such behaviour is well captured by ARCH models. Second, long memory may cause a slower decay of the autocorrelation function than would be implied by ARMA models. Fractionally integrated models have been offered as explanations. Recently, the ARFIMA–ARCH model class has been suggested as a way of coping with both phenomena simultaneously. For estimation we implement the bias correction of Cox and Reid (1987). For daily data on the Swiss 1‐month Euromarket interest rate during the period 1986–1989, the ARFIMA–ARCH (5,d,2/4) model with non‐integer d is selected by AIC. Model‐based out‐of‐sample forecasts for the mean are better than predictions based on conditionally homoscedastic white noise only for longer horizons (τ > 40). Regarding volatility forecasts, however, the selected ARFIMA–ARCH models dominate. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Forecasting using high-frequency data: a
✍ Qi Zhang; Charlie X Cai; Kevin Keasey 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB

## Abstract The first purpose of this paper is to assess the short‐run forecasting capabilities of two competing financial duration models. The forecast performance of the Autoregressive Conditional Multinomial–Autoregressive Conditional Duration (ACM‐ACD) model is better than the Asymmetric Autore

Daily FX Volatility Forecasts: Can the G
✍ David G. Mcmillan; Alan E. H. Speight 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 120 KB

## ABSTRACT Volatility forecasting remains an active area of research with no current consensus as to the model that provides the most accurate forecasts, though Hansen and Lunde (2005) have argued that in the context of daily exchange rate returns nothing can beat a GARCH(1,1) model. This paper ex