✦ LIBER ✦

Follow-up of breast cancer in primary care vs specialist care: results of an economic evaluation

✍ Scribed by Grunfeld, E; Gray, A; Mant, D; Yudkin, P; Adewuyi-Dalton, R; Coyle, D; Cole, D; Stewart, J; Fitzpatrick, R; Vessey, M

Book ID: 110001059
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 1999
Tongue: English
Weight: 91 KB
Volume: 79
Category: Article
ISSN: 0007-0920
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690197

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Potential of Survivorship Care Plans

The Potential of Survivorship Care Plans in Primary Care Follow-up of Minority Breast Cancer Patients

✍ Mary Ann Burg; Ellen D. S. Lopez; Amy Dailey; Mary Elspeth Keller; Brendan Prend 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 229 KB

Views of primary care physicians and onc

Views of primary care physicians and oncologists on cancer follow-up initiatives in primary care: an online survey

✍ Eila K. Watson; Elaine M. Sugden; Peter W. Rose 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 135 KB

Telephone follow-up after treatment for

Telephone follow-up after treatment for breast cancer: views and experiences of patients and specialist breast care nurses

✍ Kinta Beaver; Susan Williamson; Karen Chalmers 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 96 KB

Evaluation of an intensive strategy for

Evaluation of an intensive strategy for follow-up and surveillance of primary breast cancer

✍ Emmanuella Joseph; Micheline Hyacinthe; Gary H. Lyman; Carl Busch; LaTara Demps; 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 806 KB

The impact of using different costing me

The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches

✍ Fiona M. Clement (Nee Shrive); William A. Ghali; Cam Donaldson; Braden J. Manns 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 267 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract __Background__: Published guidelines on the conduct of economic evaluations provide little guidance regarding the use and potential bias of the different costing methods. __Objectives__: Using microcosting and two gross‐costing methods, we (1) compared the cost estimates within and acr

Ten-year follow-up results of a randomis

Ten-year follow-up results of a randomised controlled study comparing level-I vs level-III axillary lymph node dissection for primary breast cancer

✍ Kodama, H; Nio, Y; Iguchi, C; Kan, N 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 101 KB