𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Flux Correction Tools for Finite Elements

✍ Scribed by D. Kuzmin; S. Turek


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
479 KB
Volume
175
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9991

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Flux correction in the finite element context is addressed. Criteria for positivity of the numerical solution are formulated, and the low-order transport operator is constructed from the discrete high-order operator by adding modulated dissipation so as to eliminate negative off-diagonal entries. The corresponding antidiffusive terms can be decomposed into a sum of genuine fluxes (rather than element contributions) which represent bilateral mass exchange between individual nodes. Thereby, essentially one-dimensional flux correction tools can be readily applied to multidimensional problems involving unstructured meshes. The proposed methodology guarantees mass conservation and makes it possible to design both explicit and implicit FCT schemes based on a unified limiting strategy. Numerical results for a number of benchmark problems illustrate the performance of the algorithm.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


An Improved Finite-Element Flux-Correcte
✍ G.E Georghiou; R Morrow; A.C Metaxas 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 148 KB

An improved finite-element flux-corrected transport (FE-FCT) method for the numerical solution of hydrodynamic conservation equations is described, based on the method developed by Lohner and his collaborators to solve conservation equations in fluid mechanics, and its application is extended to gas

Positivity-preserving, flux-limited fini
✍ Robert J. MacKinnon; Graham F. Carey 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 281 KB

## Abstract A new class of positivity‐preserving, flux‐limited finite‐difference and Petrov–Galerkin (PG) finite‐element methods are devised for reactive transport problems.The methods are similar to classical TVD flux‐limited schemes with the main difference being that the flux‐limiter constraint