Fluidity in the self-concept: the shift from personal to social identity
✍ Scribed by Rina S. Onorato; John C. Turner
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2004
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 163 KB
- Volume
- 34
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
- DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.195
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Dominant personality models of the self‐concept (e.g. self‐schema theory) conceive of the self as a relatively stable cognitive representation or schema. The self‐schema controls how we process self‐relevant information across a myriad of situations. Conversely, self‐categorization theory argues that self‐perception is highly variable and context‐dependent. It was hypothesized in two studies (N=114 and 200) that the effect of personal self‐schemas on information‐processing would be eliminated when the context makes a conflicting higher‐order identity salient. Results largely supported self‐categorization theory. Across various dependent measures (trait endorsements, response latencies, and confidence in self‐descriptions), participants generally responded in line with the salient identity, even if this pattern of responding directly contradicted their personal self‐schema. Implications for dominant personality models of the self‐concept are examined. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Although the research community is now starting to provide a more detailed understanding of the magnitude and details of small businesses' greater access to information and communication technology (ICT), there is still a poor understanding of social capital and trust, two important (but not necessa
In this report, we argue that impairments in self-concept development function as a cognitive vulnerability that contributes to the formation of the eating disorders (ED) of anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN). More specifically we argue that impairments in development of the total collec
## Abstract In this research, we examine the emergence of social identity threat among members of high status groups, by assessing physiological responses to threat in addition to more traditional (self‐report) measures. We argue that physiological measures are better suited than explicit responses