𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Flow-retarding effects of vegetation and geotextiles on soil detachment during concentrated flow

✍ Scribed by A. Knapen; T. Smets; J. Poesen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
298 KB
Volume
23
Category
Article
ISSN
0885-6087

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Roughness elements at the soil surface (e.g. crop residues, rock fragments, vegetation, geotextiles) strongly reduce the erosivity of overland flow (both interrill and concentrated overland flow) and hence soil detachment rates. Common methods for shear stress partitioning that allow the calculation of effective flow shear stress in the presence of roughness elements originate from river hydraulics but seem invalid for overland flow. An alternative method to estimate the effective flow shear stress in the presence of a soil surface cover has been presented and tested for soil detachment by concentrated runoff on soil surfaces covered by crop residues by Knapen et al., (2008). In this method, the estimation of effective flow shear stress is based on the recalculation of the hydraulic radius for covered soil surfaces using flow hydraulics on uncovered surfaces. However, the applicability of this method for roughness elements different from crop residues and under field conditions needs to be tested to confirm its validity. Therefore, runoff data from three experimental studies (conducted on geotextile and grassed‐covered soil surfaces) are analysed in this study. The results show that effective flow shear stress, calculated using this method, is not only a good soil detachment predictor for soil surfaces covered with crop residues but also for the tested soil surfaces with a vegetation or geotextile cover. However, the geotextile experiments point to one of the shortcomings of the method. At high flow shear stress levels, vortex erosion due to flow turbulence is reported for the thickest geotextiles. These flow turbulences are not accounted for since the method is based on average flow characteristics. Copyright Β© 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effect of conservation tillage on ru
✍ A. Knapen; J. Poesen; G. Govers; S. De Baets πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2008 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 503 KB

## Abstract Crop residues in conservation tillage systems are known to cause both a reduction in the erosive runoff power and an increase in the topsoil erosion resistance. In this study, the relative importance of both mechanisms in reducing soil loss by concentrated flow erosion is examined. Ther

Effects of surface water storage by soil
✍ F. Darboux; C. Gascuel-Odoux; P. Davy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 236 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Overland‐flow generation is affected by surface roughness. This study analysed effects of surface roughness on overland‐flow by means of a model simulating depression filling, flow pathways and runoff generation. It examined the relevant characteristics of surface roughness using numeri

Effect of soil texture, tailwater height
✍ Robert R. Wells; Sean J. Bennett; Carlos V. Alonso πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 604 KB

## Abstract Rill and gully erosion in upland and agricultural areas can result in significant soil degradation worldwide, and headcuts are the primary mechanism by which this landscape dissection occurs. Experiments were conducted to further examine the morphodynamic behavior of actively migrating