𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Fish fingers: digit homologues in sarcopterygian fish fins

✍ Scribed by Zerina Johanson; Jean Joss; Catherine A. Boisvert; Rolf Ericsson; Margareta Sutija; Per E. Ahlberg


Book ID
102891823
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
555 KB
Volume
308B
Category
Article
ISSN
1552-5007

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

A defining feature of tetrapod evolutionary origins is the transition from fish fins to tetrapod limbs. A major change during this transition is the appearance of the autopod (hands, feet), which comprises two distinct regions, the wrist/ankle and the digits. When the autopod first appeared in Late Devonian fossil tetrapods, it was incomplete: digits evolved before the full complement of wrist/ankle bones. Early tetrapod wrists/ankles, including those with a full complement of bones, also show a sharp pattern discontinuity between proximal elements and distal elements. This suggests the presence of a discontinuity in the proximal‐distal sequence of development. Such a discontinuity occurs in living urodeles, where digits form before completion of the wrist/ankle, implying developmental independence of the digits from wrist/ankle elements. We have observed comparable independent development of pectoral fin radials in the lungfish Neoceratodus (Osteichthyes: Sarcopterygii), relative to homologues of the tetrapod limb and proximal wrist elements in the main fin axis. Moreover, in the Neoceratodus fin, expression of Hoxd13 closely matches late expression patterns observed in the tetrapod autopod. This evidence suggests that Neoceratodus fin radials and tetrapod digits may be patterned by shared mechanisms distinct from those patterning the proximal fin/limb elements, and in that sense are homologous. The presence of independently developing radials in the distal part of the pectoral (and pelvic) fin may be a general feature of the Sarcopterygii. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 308B:757–768, 2007. Β© 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Shark fishing in fin soup
✍ A.R. Hoelzel πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› Springer Netherlands 🌐 English βš– 77 KB
Homology of the paired fins in fishes
✍ A. Brazier Howell πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1933 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 324 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Recent and fossil fishes may be divided into groups having both pectoral and pelvic fins, pectorals only, pelvics only, or with a second pair of fins located anteriorly and seemingly not homologous with pelvics. In some groups the pelvics are located near the cloaca, with an extensive h

Evolution of gastrulation in the ray-fin
✍ Mark S. Cooper; Valerie C. Virta πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 825 KB

## Abstract Sometime before or during the early Mesozoic era, new lineages of actinopterygian (ray‐finned) fishes radically transformed their mode of gastrulation. During this evolutionary transformation, yolky endoderm was a hotspot for ontogenetic change. As holoblastic cleavage patterns were mod

Evolution of median fin modules in the a
✍ Mabee, Paula M. ;Crotwell, Patricia L. ;Bird, Nathan C. ;Burke, Ann C. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2002 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 420 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Detailed examples of how hierarchical assemblages of modules change over time are few. We found broadly conserved phylogenetic patterns in the directions of development within the median fins of fishes. From these, we identify four modules involved in their positioning and patterning. The evolutiona