𝔖 Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

πŸ“

Finite Automata, Formal Logic, and Circuit Complexity

✍ Scribed by Howard Straubing


Publisher
BirkhΓ€user Basel
Year
1994
Tongue
English
Leaves
235
Series
Progress in Theoretical Computer Science
Edition
1
Category
Library

⬇  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The study of the connections between mathematical automata and forΒ­ mal logic is as old as theoretical computer science itself. In the founding paper of the subject, published in 1936, Turing showed how to describe the behavior of a universal computing machine with a formula of firstΒ­ order predicate logic, and thereby concluded that there is no algorithm for deciding the validity of sentences in this logic. Research on the logΒ­ ical aspects of the theory of finite-state automata, which is the subject of this book, began in the early 1960's with the work of J. Richard Biichi on monadic second-order logic. Biichi's investigations were extended in several directions. One of these, explored by McNaughton and Papert in their 1971 monograph Counter-free Automata, was the characterization of automata that admit first-order behavioral descriptions, in terms of the semigroupΒ­ theoretic approach to automata that had recently been developed in the work of Krohn and Rhodes and of Schiitzenberger. In the more than twenty years that have passed since the appearance of McNaughton and Papert's book, the underlying semigroup theory has grown enorΒ­ mously, permitting a considerable extension of their results. During the same period, however, fundamental investigations in the theory of finite automata by and large fell out of fashion in the theoretical comΒ­ puter science community, which moved to other concerns.

✦ Table of Contents


Front Matter....Pages i-xii
Mathematical Preliminaries....Pages 1-8
Formal Languages and Formal Logic....Pages 9-20
Finite Automata....Pages 21-37
Model-Theoretic Games....Pages 39-52
Finite Semigroups....Pages 53-78
First-Order Logic....Pages 79-98
Modular Quantifiers....Pages 99-126
Circuit Complexity....Pages 127-153
Regular Languages and Circuit Complexity....Pages 155-178
Back Matter....Pages 179-227

✦ Subjects


Math Applications in Computer Science; Applications of Mathematics; Information and Communication, Circuits; Mathematical Logic and Formal Languages; Arithmetic and Logic Structures; Mathematical Logic and Foundations


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Finite Automata, Formal Logic, and Circu
✍ Howard Straubing πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 1994 πŸ› BirkhΓ€user Basel 🌐 English

The study of the connections between mathematical automata and formal logic is as old as theoretical computer science itself. In the founding paper of the subject, published in 1936, Turing showed how to describe the behavior of a universal computing machine with a formula of first-order predicate l

Logic, Automata, and Computational Compl
✍ Bruce M. Kapron, editor πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2023 πŸ› Association for Computing Machinery 🌐 English

Professor Stephen A. Cook is a pioneer of the theory of computational complexity. His work on NP-completeness and the P vs. NP problem remains a central focus of this field. Cook won the 1982 Turing Award for "his advancement of our understanding of the complexity of computation in a significant and

Weighted Automata, Formal Power Series a
✍ Laura Wirth πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2022 πŸ› Springer Spektrum 🌐 English

<span>The main objective of this work is to represent the behaviors of weighted automata by expressively equivalent formalisms: rational operations on formal power series, linear representations by means of matrices, and weighted monadic second-order logic.Β <br>First, we exhibit the classical result

Weighted Automata, Formal Power Series a
✍ Laura Wirth πŸ“‚ Library πŸ“… 2022 πŸ› Springer Spektrum 🌐 English

<span>The main objective of this work is to represent the behaviors of weighted automata by expressively equivalent formalisms: rational operations on formal power series, linear representations by means of matrices, and weighted monadic second-order logic. <br>First, we exhibit the classical result