𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Financial futures, bank portfolio risk, and accounting

✍ Scribed by Michael R. Asay; Gisela A. Gonzalez; Benjamin Wolkowitz


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
727 KB
Volume
1
Category
Article
ISSN
0270-7314

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


the three federal bank regulatory agencies (i.e., 0 the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the Comptroller of the Currency) issued uniform guidelines applicable to commercial and mutual savings bank participation in financial futures and forward and standby contracts.' These guidelines became effective on January 1, 1980.

The guidelines have a number of provisions which basically can be divided into two major components: the internal management aspect and the accounting requirements. To the extent there has been any comment on the first component of these guidelines, it has generally been agreed that they encourage prudent managerial controls which should facilitate the use of financial futures by banks.2 The accounting guidelines have generated the opposite reaction. Indeed, it has been argued that banks have been discouraged from using futures contracts by the accounting standards, at least in the context of their investment activities. The problem is that the accounting standards require that a bank mark its futures contracts 'Actually the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency revised its Circular 79 to conform to the guidelines of the two other agencies. There are some differences among the agency statements, but these differences are more a matter of style than of substance. The guidelines do not distinguish among the various ways in which a commitment can he made for future delivery of a security. Although futures and forward contracts are in many respects interchangeable, standby contracts are more akin to put options than to either futures or forward contracts. This article is concerned with bank use of futures contracts; however, much of the analysis is applicable to forward contracts as well.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Accounting for interest rate futures in
✍ Laurie S. Goodman; Martha J. Langer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 879 KB

any commercial banks use financial futures to hedge their dealer and M trading operations. These institutions do not, however, use financial futures extensively for asset-liability management. Unfavorable accounting rules is one of the reasons often mentioned for the limited use of futures in balanc

Reducing inter-temporal risk in financia
✍ Mark Pitts; Robert W. Kopprasch πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 720 KB

As a matter of convenience, in this article we shall pose the hedging problem in the context of hedging a rate for issuing liabilities. However, the methods and strategies will be equally applicable to hedging the future sale or purchase of an asset. Further, we define "risk" to be synonomous with a

Risk premiums in financial futures marke
✍ Mark S. Rzepczynski πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1987 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 634 KB

More specifically, futures prices may influence storage and inventory decisions and may exact an important influence on production decisions. This is their price discovery function. Futures markets are seen as an efficient collector, processor, and disseminator of information. 'The large number of

Interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and
✍ Carl Alan Batlin πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1983 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 547 KB

e development of futures markets in financial instruments has provided fi-T. nancial intermediaries, among others, with a vehicle for hedging against unanticipated changes in interest rates.' Protection against these fluctuations can benefit lending institutions which have exposed themselves to inte

Estimating financial risk measures for f
✍ John Cotter; Kevin Dowd πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 124 KB

## Abstract This study presents nonparametric estimates of spectral risk measures (SRM) applied to long and short positions in five prominent equity futures contracts. It also compares these to estimates of two popular alternative measures, the Value‐at‐Risk and Expected Shortfall. The SRMs are con