✍ Scribed by K.Y. Li; T. Xu; W.A. Cawley; J.A. Colapret; J.S. Bonner; A. Ernest; P.B. Verramachaneni
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
A fire-wall area (about 270' x 310') with the Bunker C oil contaminated soil was selected for the bioremediation field test. This fire-wall area was separated into 18 plots by dirt dikes to test 6 bioremediation methods with three tests of each method. The six treatment methods were: a) Aeration with basic nutrients and indigenous organisms (BNIO); b) Aeration with basic nutrients and inoculation from a refinery wastewater treatment facility (BNSIWT); c) Aeration with an oleophilic fertilizer and indigenous organisms (INIPOL); d) Aeration with basic nutrients and biosurfactant organisms (EPA Seal Beach consortia) (EPA); e) Aeration with proprietary nutrients and organisms (PRO); and f) Aeration only for active control (CONTROL). This field test was conducted for 91 days. In general the oil contents in 18 plots were reduced, but the results showed significant fluctuations. A statistical method was used to examine if the oil reductions of six methods were the results from the random error of sampling and sample analysis or biodegradation. The results of the statistical analysis showed that oil reduction was concluded from all but the plots of PRO. From the data analysis, it may be concluded that the oil reduction rate in these studies is controlled by oil transfer from soil into the aqueous solution. An example of calculation was used to illustrate this conclusion.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES