𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Fibularis tertius: Revisiting the anatomy

✍ Scribed by K. Rourke; H. Dafydd; I.G. Parkin


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
173 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0897-3806

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Fibularis tertius (FT) may be used during reconstructive surgery and muscle transposition with retention of function. The muscle was examined in both lower limbs of 41 cadavers. Measurements were made of muscle belly length and width, tendon length and width, and the size of the origin on the fibula. Tendon insertion, nerve and blood supplies were also examined. FT was absent in five (6.1%) lower limbs of three (7.3%) subjects. The size of its origin demonstrated inter‐ and intra‐individual variation. FT arose from the distal fibula and on average occupied (28.4 Β± 9.1)% (mean Β± S. D.) of the total shaft length. In all cases the tendon inserted into the dorsal surface of the shafts of both the fourth and fifth metatarsals. A small nerve branch consistently arose from the deep fibular nerve near the origin of extensor digitorum longus. The nerve ran parallel to the length of this muscle, between it and extensor hallucis longus, before piercing FT. Anatomy textbooks describe FT as inserting into the fifth metatarsal only. This study, supported by data from previous reports, suggests that the β€œtextbook” accounts of FT should be updated to record that most commonly its tendon reaches both the fourth and fifth metatarsals. Clin. Anat. 20:946–949, 2007. Β© 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Anatomy of the SMAS Revisited
✍ Alireza Ghassemi; Andreas Prescher; Dieter Riediger; Hubertus Axer πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Springer 🌐 English βš– 328 KB
The anatomy of the heart revisited
✍ Anderson, Robert H. ;Brown, Nigel A. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 659 KB

Background: There is a marked conservative tendency to be found in anatomic descriptions, with a seeming reluctance on the part of acknowledged experts to test new theories by returning to direct studies of gross anatomy. This tendency has become manifest to us during recent attempts to review the s