Fibroblast procollagen production rates in vitro based on [3H]hydroxyproline production and procollagen hydroxyproline specific activity
✍ Scribed by Joan G. Clark; James N. Hildebran
- Book ID
- 102986092
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1984
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 698 KB
- Volume
- 140
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0003-2697
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
In vitro procollagen production rates can be determined by culturing cells in the presence of [3H]proline and measuring the subsequent formation of [3H]hydroxyproline. Values of actual procollagen production can be calculated if the total radioactivity and the specific activity of the newly synthesized procollagen is known. A simple microanalytical method for measuring procollagen specific activity in order to determine procollagen production by lung fibroblasts in vitro is reported. Confluent fibroblasts (IMR-90) were cultured in fresh medium containing [3H]proline, and [3H]hydroxyproline production and prolyl hydroxylation were measured. Hydroxyproline specific activity of nondialyzable procollagen in culture medium as well as extracellular and intracellular free proline specific activity were determined by an ultramicromethod in which the radiolabeled amino acids were reacted with [14C]dansyl chloride of known specific activity [Airhart et al. (1979) Anal. Biochem. 96, 45-55]. Procollagen production rates were readily determined by this method using 5 to 20 microCi [3H]proline and approximately 10(6) cells. It was found that 3H-procollagen production rate into culture medium was constant after a lag of 1.6 h, while procollagen production rate (0.23 pmol/microgram DNA . h) was constant from time zero to 9 h. The specific activities of extracellular and intracellular free proline were not constant during the labeling period, nor were they equal to procollagen specific activity. These data indicate that free proline pool specific activities are not a valid measure of procollagen specific activity. The experimental approach described obviates the need to define or characterize the proline precursor pool from which procollagen is synthesized, and may be readily applied to determine fibroblast procollagen production rates in vitro.