𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Feigning in adjudicative competence evaluations

✍ Scribed by Sherif Soliman; Phillip J. Resnick

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
116 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0735-3936

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Five year research update (1996–2000): e
Five year research update (1996–2000): evaluations for competence to stand trial (adjudicative competence)
✍ Denise L. Mumley; Chad E. Tillbrook; Thomas Grisso πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 132 KB

## Abstract This article reviews and evaluates publications during 1996–2000 with relevance for assessments of competence to stand trial (also known as adjudicative competence). The review focuses specifically on articles that provide new concepts or data supported by research or case analyses. The

Opinion formation in evaluating the adju
Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations
✍ Janet I. Warren; Daniel C. Murrie; William Stejskal; Lori H. Colwell; James Morr πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 132 KB

## Abstract Evaluations of competence to stand trial (CST) are the most common type of criminal forensic evaluation conducted, and courts tend to defer to clinician opinions regarding a defendant's competence. Thus, it is important to study the ways in which clinicians arrive at opinions regarding

Cultural competence in evaluation: An ov
Cultural competence in evaluation: An overview
✍ Saumitra SenGupta; Rodney Hopson; Melva Thompson-Robinson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2004 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 73 KB

## Abstract This chapter is an overview of the understanding of cultural competence and context in evaluation, highlighting how other disciplines have addressed the importance of culture and suggesting the value‐addedness of culture to program evaluation and design.