Feasibility of FAIR imaging for evaluating tumor perfusion

✍ Scribed by Jee-Hyun Cho; Gyunggoo Cho; Youngkyu Song; Chulhyun Lee; Bum-Woo Park; Chang Kyung Lee; Namkug Kim; Sung Bin Park; Jong Soon Kang; Moo Rim Kang; Hwan Mook Kim; Young Ro Kim; Kyoung-Sik Cho; Jeong Kon Kim

• Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
• Year: 2010
• Tongue: English
• Weight: 346 KB
• Volume: 32
• Category: Article
• ISSN: 1053-1807
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.22298

✦ Synopsis

Abstract

Purpose:

To evaluate the feasibility of flow‐sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) for measuring blood flow in tumor models.

Materials and Methods:

In eight mice tumor models, FAIR and dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE‐MRI) was performed. The reliability for measuring blood flow on FAIR was evaluated using the coefficient of variation of blood flow on psoas muscle. Three regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn in the peripheral, intermediate, and central portions within each tumor. The location of ROI was the same on FAIR and DCE‐MR images. The correlation between the blood flow on FAIR and perfusion‐related parameters on DCE‐MRI was evaluated using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

Results:

The coefficient of variation for measuring blood flow was 9.8%. Blood flow on FAIR showed a strong correlation with Kep (r = 0.77), percent relative enhancement (r = 0.73), and percent enhancement ratio (r = 0.81). The mean values of blood flow (mL/100 g/min) (358 vs. 207), Kep (sec^−^^1^) (7.46 vs. 1.31), percent relative enhancement (179% vs. 134%), and percent enhancement ratio (42% vs. 26%) were greater in the peripheral portion than in the central portion (P < 0.01).

Conclusion:

As blood flow measurement on FAIR is reliable and closely related with that on DCE‐MR, FAIR is feasible for measuring tumor blood flow. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010;32:738–744. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.