✦ LIBER ✦

FDG-PET as a Prognostic Factor in High-grade Astrocytoma

✍ Scribed by Olivier De Witte; Florence Lefranc; Marc Levivier; Isabelle Salmon; Jacques Brotchi; Serge Goldman

Book ID: 111564184
Publisher: Springer US
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 35 KB
Volume: 49
Category: Article
ISSN: 0167-594X
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026518002800

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Expression of autocrine motility factor

Expression of autocrine motility factor mRNA is a poor prognostic factor in high-grade astrocytoma

✍ Yoshinori Tanizaki; Yuichi Sato; Hidehiro Oka; Satoshi Utsuki; Koji Kondo; Yoshi 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 479 KB

Independent prognostic value of pre-trea

Independent prognostic value of pre-treatment 18-FDG-PET in high-grade gliomas

✍ Cécile Colavolpe; Philippe Metellus; Julien Mancini; Maryline Barrie; Céline Béq 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 292 KB

266 PET-FDG uptake as a prognostic indic

266 PET-FDG uptake as a prognostic indicator in gliomas

✍ M.M. Fitzek; H. Aronen; J. Efird; F. Hochberg; A. Fischman; F.S. Pardo 📂 Article 📅 1995 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 163 KB

Prognostic factors in pediatric high-gra

Prognostic factors in pediatric high-grade astrocytoma: the importance of accurate pathologic diagnosis

✍ Russell K. Hales; Ori Shokek; Peter C. Burger; Nina P. Paynter; Kaisorn L. Chaic 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer US 🌐 English ⚖ 279 KB

FDG–PET. A possible prognostic factor in

FDG–PET. A possible prognostic factor in head and neck cancer

✍ Halfpenny, W; Hain, S F; Biassoni, L; Maisey, M N; Sherman, J A; McGurk, M 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Nature Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 86 KB

Histologic grade as a prognostic factor

Histologic grade as a prognostic factor in breast carcinoma

✍ Harry B. Burke; Donald Earl Henson 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 47 KB 👁 2 views

I n this issue of Cancer, Dr. Roberti reviews the role of histologic grade in the prognosis of breast carcinoma and wonders why, because it is available, it has not been widely used in predicting outcome. The position of this editorial is that there must be some fundamental reason, after 100 years