𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

FAU regulates carboplatin resistance in ovarian cancer

✍ Scribed by Esther L. Moss; Mirna Mourtada-Maarabouni; Mark R. Pickard; Charles W. Redman; Gwyn T. Williams


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Weight
170 KB
Volume
49
Category
Article
ISSN
1045-2257

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The development of chemotherapy resistance by cancer cells is complex, using different mechanisms and pathways. The gene FAU (Finkel‐Biskis‐Reilly murine sarcoma virus (__F__BR‐MuSV)‐__a__ssociated __u__biquitously expressed gene) was identified through functional expression cloning and previous data have shown that overexpression enhances apoptosis in several cell types. We demonstrate that the expression of FAU was reduced in the A2780cis (cisplatin resistant subclone of A2780) cell line compared with the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line, and was directly related to the cell line's sensitivity to carboplatin. Downregulation of FAU in the A2780 cell line by transfection with two predesigned short‐interfering RNAs (siRNAs) to FAU resulted in a significant increase in resistance to carboplatin‐induced cell death. Downregulation resulted in increased cell viability and reduced apoptosis after 72 hr of drug treatment compared with the negative controls (Kruskal‐Wallis P = 0.0002). Transfection of the A2780cis cell line with the pcDNA3 plasmid containing FAU was associated with increased sensitivity to carboplatin‐induced apoptosis, with decreased cell viability and increased apoptosis (Mann Whitney P < 0.0001). The expression of FAU was examined by quantitative real‐time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction in normal and malignant ovarian tissue. A significant reduction in the expression of FAU was seen in the malignant compared with normal ovarian samples (Kruskal‐Wallis P = 0.0261). These data support a role for FAU in the regulation of platinum‐resistance in ovarian cancer. Further research is needed into the apoptotic pathway containing FAU to investigate the potential for targeted therapies to increase or restore the platinum sensitivity of ovarian cancer. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Multidrug resistance in ovarian cancer
✍ Antonio Fojo; Thomas C. Hamilton; Robert C. Young; Robert F. Ozols 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 687 KB

The development of acquired resistance has limited the effectiveness of chemotherapy in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Experimental model systems were developed to study the mechanisms associated with primary resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and broad cross-resistance (multidrug resistance) w

A phase 1 and pharmacodynamic study of d
✍ Fang Fang; Curt Balch; Jeanne Schilder; Timothy Breen; Shu Zhang; Changyu Shen; 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 412 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract ## BACKGROUND: Aberrant DNA methylation is a hallmark of cancer, and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors have demonstrated clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies. On the basis of preclinical studies indicating that hypomethylating agents can reverse platinum resistance in ovarian c

Mechanisms and modulation of resistance
✍ Raymond P. Perez; Thomas C. Hamilton; Robert F. Ozols; Robert C. Young 📂 Article 📅 1993 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 1005 KB

Chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer remains suboptimal. Despite the improvements in objective response rates realized with cisplatin-based combination chemotherapeutic regimens, most patients still die of refractory cancer. Drug resistance has emerged as the single most important determinant of

Quantitative proteome analysis of multid
✍ Sang-Lin Li; Feng Ye; Wei-Jun Cai; Huai-Dong Hu; Peng Hu; Hong Ren; Fu-Fan Zhu; 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 271 KB

## Abstract In order to understand the molecular mechanisms of multidrug resistance (MDR) in ovarian cancer, we employed the proteomic approach of isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), followed by LC‐MS/MS, using the cisplatin‐resistant COC1/DDP cell line and its parental