๐”– Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

๐Ÿ“

Fate, Time, and Language: An Essay on Free Will

โœ Scribed by David Foster Wallace, Steven M. Cahn, Maureen Eckert, Jay Garfield, James Ryerson


Publisher
Columbia University Press
Year
2010
Tongue
English
Leaves
264
Edition
Reprint
Category
Library

โฌ‡  Acquire This Volume

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


In 1962, the philosopher Richard Taylor used six commonly accepted presuppositions to imply that human beings have no control over the future. David Foster Wallace not only took issue with Taylor's method, which, according to him, scrambled the relations of logic, language, and the physical world, but also noted a semantic trick at the heart of Taylor's argument.

Fate, Time, and Language presents Wallace's brilliant critique of Taylor's work. Written long before the publication of his fiction and essays, Wallace's thesis reveals his great skepticism of abstract thinking made to function as a negation of something more genuine and real. He was especially suspicious of certain paradigms of thought-the cerebral aestheticism of modernism, the clever gimmickry of postmodernism-that abandoned "the very old traditional human verities that have to do with spirituality and emotion and community." As Wallace rises to meet the challenge to free will presented by Taylor, we witness the developing perspective of this major novelist, along with his struggle to establish solid logical ground for his convictions. This volume, edited by Steven M. Cahn and Maureen Eckert, reproduces Taylor's original article and other works on fatalism cited by Wallace. James Ryerson's introduction connects Wallace's early philosophical work to the themes and explorations of his later fiction, and Jay Garfield supplies a critical biographical epilogue.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Fate, Time, and Language: An Essay on Fr
โœ David Foster Wallace ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Columbia University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<P>In 1962, the philosopher Richard Taylor used six commonly accepted presuppositions to imply that human beings have no control over the future. David Foster Wallace not only took issue with Taylor's method, which, according to him, scrambled the relations of logic, language, and the physical world

Fate, Time, and Language: An Essay on Fr
โœ David Wallace (editor); Steven Cahn (editor); Maureen Eckert (editor); James Rye ๐Ÿ“‚ Library ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› Columbia University Press ๐ŸŒ English

<p>In 1962, the philosopher Richard Taylor used six commonly accepted presuppositions to imply that human beings have no control over the future. David Foster Wallace not only took issue with Taylor's method, which, according to him, scrambled the relations of logic, language, and the physical world