𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Fat suppression strategies in enhanced MR imaging of the breast: Comparison of SPIR and water excitation sequences

✍ Scribed by Mamoru Niitsu; Eriko Tohno; Yuji Itai


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2003
Tongue
English
Weight
175 KB
Volume
18
Category
Article
ISSN
1053-1807

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Purpose

To compare two fat suppression techniques of spectrally‐selective inversion pulse (spectral presaturation with inversion recovery—SPIR) and spectral‐spatial excitation pulse of water excitation (WE) for contrast‐enhanced MR imaging of the breast.

Materials and Methods

Forty women with histologically‐proven breast cancer were examined. Both pulse types were applied to postcontrast, axial, three‐dimensional field echo sequence. Contrast noise ratios (CNR) of lesion‐to‐breast parenchyma, lesion‐to‐fat, and parenchyma‐to‐fat were determined. Qualitative image analysis using a four‐point scale was also performed by two observers.

Results

All the CNR values of obtained with WE techniques were significantly higher than those with SPIR. Qualitative analysis indicated that the WE images were statistically superior for the lesion‐to‐breast parenchyma contrast while being slightly inferior to the SPIR images for fat suppression homogeneity without statistical significance.

Conclusion

Compared to SPIR, the WE technique suppressed the subcutaneous fat signal more potently and improved the contrast of the enhanced breast lesion against the parenchyma and the subcutaneous fat. WE will be a powerful fat suppression strategy for enhanced MR imaging of the breast. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;18:310–314. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Solitary hepatic metastasis: Comparison
✍ Richard C. Semelka; J. Patrick Shoenut; Susan M. Ascher; Mervyn A. Kroeker; Howa 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 649 KB

## Abstract Twenty consecutive cancer patients with a solitary hepatic metastasis detected with dynamic contrast‐material—enhanced computed tomography (CT) who were considered for hepatic resection underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging within 18 days after CT. Histologic confirmation was obtain