✦ LIBER ✦

Fascial sling more effective than Burch colposuspension at reducing stress incontinence

Book ID: 111977970
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
Year: 2007
Tongue: English
Weight: 87 KB
Volume: 4
Category: Article
ISSN: 1743-4254
DOI: 10.1038/ncpuro0848

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Burch Colposuspension versus Fascial Sli

Burch Colposuspension versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence

✍ Albo, Michael E.; Richter, Holly E.; Brubaker, Linda; Norton, Peggy; Kraus, Step 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Massachusetts Medical Society 🌐 English ⚖ 481 KB

Re: Burch Colposuspension versus Fascial

Re: Burch Colposuspension versus Fascial Sling to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence

✍ Firouz Daneshgari 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 88 KB

Complications in Women Undergoing Burch

Complications in Women Undergoing Burch Colposuspension Versus Autologous Rectus Fascial Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

✍ Chai, Toby C.; Albo, Michael E.; Richter, Holly E.; Norton, Peggy A.; Dandreo, K 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins 🌐 English ⚖ 200 KB

Complications in Women Undergoing Burch

Complications in Women Undergoing Burch Colposuspension Versus Autologous Rectus Fascial Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence

✍ Rovner, E.S. 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 45 KB

Tension-free vaginal tape was more cost-

Tension-free vaginal tape was more cost-effective than open colposuspension for treatment of stress urinary incontinence

📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 86 KB