𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Family-level cost-effectiveness analysis: Response to Holmes’ commentary

✍ Scribed by Amy E. Bonomi; Paul A. Fishman; Denise M. Boudreau; Richard T. Meenan; Dennis Revicki

Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
2005
Tongue
English
Weight
126 KB
Volume
14
Category
Article
ISSN
0962-9343

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

DISCOUNTING HEALTH AND COST-EFFECTIVENES
DISCOUNTING HEALTH AND COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS: A RESPONSE TO NORD
✍ James K. Hammitt 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 61 KB 👁 1 views

## SUMMARY Nord (2011) criticizes standard arguments which assert that consistency requires that future health benefits must be discounted at the same rate as future costs in cost‐effectiveness analysis (CEA). He suggests these arguments are misguided because they require transitivity of preference

A guide to economic evaluation: Methods
A guide to economic evaluation: Methods for cost-effectiveness analysis of person-level data
✍ Jeffrey S. Hoch; Mark W. Smith 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 151 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract The authors introduce economic evaluation with particular attention to cost‐effectiveness analysis. They begin by establishing why health care decisions should be guided by economics. They then explore different types of economic evaluations. To illustrate how to conduct and evaluate a

Recognising diversity in public preferen
Recognising diversity in public preferences: the use of preference sub-groups in cost-effectiveness analysis. A response to Sculpher and Gafni
✍ Angela Robinson; David Parkin 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 63 KB 👁 1 views

A recent paper in this journal by Sculpher and Gafni (henceforth S&G), argues for the use of 'preference sub-groups' in determining health state utilities values for use in cost-effectiveness analyses [1]. S&G adopt as a starting point the suggestion that the source of utilities should be the genera