## Summary Deliberation over and relative preference for general or specific (broad or narrow) constructs has long been an important issue in organizational behavior research. In this article, we provide a review of this general issue and some specific recommendations for researchers. We begin by d
‘Family’ in organizational research: a review and comparison of definitions and measures
✍ Scribed by Teresa J. Rothausen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 168 KB
- Volume
- 20
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-3796
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Interest in the impact of family on work has grown in recent years; family is emerging as a signi®cant source of understanding work attitudes and behaviors. However, no consensus and little discussion exists regarding how organizational researchers should de®ne and measure `family'. In this article, I reviewed the de®nitions of family in other literatures and those implied by measures of family used in organizational research on work attitudes and behaviors. Analysis revealed ®ve substantive themes in the measurement of family by organizational researchers: perceptions about the importance of the family role to the individual, attitudes toward family, numbers and types of dependents, the role played in the family, and the support available from family members. I then discussed the need for a comprehensive measure of dependents, and developed a new measure, Responsibility for Dependents (RFD). I examined the ®ve types of measures empirically, and discussed empirical and conceptual dierences between measures of family. Finally, I addressed issues regarding the measurement of family for organizational research, including the need for more inclusive and diverse measures and the need for further research.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
It is generally acknowledged that mental illness creates burdens for family caregivers. Since the 1950s, medical literature has identified the type and extent of those burdens, especially for families of patients with schizophrenia. Whereas the imperative to identify interventions for these families
## Abstract **Background** The evidence base for forensic mental health (FMH) services has been developing since the late 1990s. Are outcome measures sound enough for the evaluation tasks? **Aims** To identify, from published literature, outcome measures used in FMH research and, where feasible, a
## Abstract ## Background. The aim of this study was to systematically analyze outcome measures in head and neck cancer trials using the International Classification of Functioning. Disability, and Health (ICF) as reference. ## Methods. Clinical trials 2000 to 2006 in MEDLINE were selected accor