We show that every n-vertex cubic graph with girth at least g have domination number at most 0.299871n+O(n / g) < 3n / 10+O(n / g) This research was done when the Petr Škoda was a student of
Families of pairs of graphs with a large number of common cards
✍ Scribed by Andrew Bowler; Paul Brown; Trevor Fenner
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 282 KB
- Volume
- 63
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0364-9024
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
The vertex‐deleted subgraph G−v, obtained from the graph G by deleting the vertex v and all edges incident to v, is called a card of G. The deck of G is the multiset of its unlabelled vertex‐deleted subgraphs. The number of common cards of G and H (or between G and H) is the cardinality of the multiset intersection of the decks of G and H. In this article, we present infinite families of pairs of graphs of order n ≥ 4 that have at least \documentclass{article}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}\begin{eqnarray*}2\lfloor\frac{1}{3}(n-1)\rfloor\end{eqnarray*}\end{document} common cards; we conjecture that these, along with a small number of other families constructed from them, are the only pairs of graphs having this many common cards, for sufficiently large n. This leads us to propose a new stronger version of the Reconstruction Conjecture. In addition, we present an infinite family of pairs of graphs with the same degree sequence that have \documentclass{article}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}\begin{eqnarray*}\frac{2}{3}(n+5-2\sqrt{3n+6})\end{eqnarray*}\end{document} common cards, for appropriate values of n, from which we can construct pairs having slightly fewer common cards for all other values of n≥10. We also present infinite families of pairs of forests and pairs of trees with \documentclass{article}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}\begin{eqnarray*}2\lfloor\frac{1}{3}(n-4)\rfloor\end{eqnarray*}\end{document} and \documentclass{article}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}\begin{eqnarray*}2\lfloor\frac{1}{3}(n-5)\rfloor\end{eqnarray*}\end{document} common cards, respectively. We then present new families that have the maximum number of common cards when one graph is connected and the other disconnected. Finally, we present a family with a large number of common cards, where one graph is a tree and the other unicyclic, and discuss how many cards are required to determine whether a graph is a tree. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Graph Theory 63: 146–163, 2010
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Chvatal established that r(T,, K,,) = (m -1 ) ( n -1 ) + 1, where T, , , is an arbitrary tree of order m and K, is the complete graph of order n. This result was extended by Chartrand, Gould, and Polimeni who showed K, could be replaced by a graph with clique number n and order n + 5 provided n 2 3
Gyárfás and Sumner independently conjectured that for every tree T and integer k there is an integer f (k, T ) such that every graph G with χ(G) > f(k, t) contains either K k or an induced copy of T . We prove a `topological´version of the conjecture: for every tree T and integer k there is g(k, T )
It was proved by Hell and Zhu that, if G is a series-parallel graph of girth at least 2 (3k -1)/2 , then χ c (G) ≤ 4k/(2k -1). In this article, we prove that the girth requirement is sharp, i.e., for any k ≥ 2, there is a series-parallel graph G of girth 2 (3k -1)/2 -1 such that χ c (G) > 4k/(2k -1)
## Abstract Širáň constructed infinite families of __k__‐crossing‐critical graphs for every __k__⩾3 and Kochol constructed such families of simple graphs for every __k__⩾2. Richter and Thomassen argued that, for any given __k__⩾1 and __r__⩾6, there are only finitely many simple __k__‐crossing‐criti
This formula was proved in [2] by means of generating functions. ## 2. INTERPRETATION OF THE FORMULA'S SUMMANDS Our bijection is based on an appropriate lattice-path-interpretation for the formula's summands (pointed out by Krattenthaler [4]): Clearly, we article no. TA962754 154 0097-3165Â97 25.0