𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Familial clustering of colon, breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers as assessed by family history

✍ Scribed by Christine L. Nelson; Thomas A. Sellers; Stephen S. Rich; John D. Potter; Paul G. McGovern; Lawrence H. Kushi


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1993
Tongue
English
Weight
571 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
0741-0395

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The aggregation of colon, endometrial, ovarian, and possibly breast cancers in families has been described as a “cancer family syndrome” (now called Lynch syndrome II). To determine if the familial clustering of these malignancies was more common in women with cancer than without, we analyzed data from the Iowa Women's Health Study (IWHS), a population‐based sample of 41,837 women aged 55–69 years. Self‐reported information was collected on history of colon, uterine, ovarian, and breast cancers in female first‐degree relatives. A family history of cancer of the breast (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4), colon (OR = 1.3), and uterus (OR = 1.3), but not ovary (OR = 1.2), was significantly more common among women with a personal history of any of these four cancers (all P < 0.05); the pattern of the ORs suggested strongly that the clustering tended to be site‐specific. Age‐adjusted relative risks (RR) of incident colon cancer over 5 years of follow‐up (N = 237) were calculated with regard to family history. Colon cancer incidence was increased among women with a family history of breast (RR = l.3), uterine (RR = 1.4), colon (RR = l.5), and ovarian (RR = 1.3) cancers, although none of the risk estimates achieved statistical significance. RR was, however, significantly related to the number of different cancer sites reported among family members (P~trend~ = 0.008). These data on a representative sample of postmenopausal women suggest that family histories of colon, breast, uterine, and ovarian cancers are associated with an increased risk of cancer at the same site, but provide little support for the hypothesis that Lynch syndrome II is a non‐random occurrence. © 1993 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Association between family history of ca
✍ Angela M. Tutera; Thomas A. Sellers; John D. Potter; Carol R. Drinkard; Georgia 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 906 KB

There are recent data to suggest that risk factors for breast cancer may differ according to whether the tumor expresses detectable levels of the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). While a family history of breast cancer is one of the most consistent predictors of the disease, we

BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and
✍ McInerney-Leo, Aideen ;Biesecker, Barbara Bowles ;Hadley, Donald W. ;Kase, Ronal 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 83 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract It remains uncertain whether members of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) families experience psychological distress with genetic testing and whether pre‐test counseling can have a moderating effect on client well‐being. One purpose of this study was to assess change in psycho

Assessment of the need for palliative ca
✍ Bart H. P. Osse; Myrra J. F. J. Vernooij-Dassen; Berna P. W. de Vree; Egbert Sch 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB 👁 3 views

## BACKGROUND. Palliative care should fit the needs of individual cancer patients and their families. Instruments can help to improve needs assessment. This review evaluates questionnaires for the systematic assessment of needs experienced by individual cancer patients for help, care, or support, a