๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

False positive results in cytotoxicity testing due to unexpectedly volatile compounds

โœ Scribed by Ciapetti, G. ;Granchi, D. ;Verri, E. ;Savarino, L. ;Stea, S. ;Savioli, F. ;Gori, A. ;Pizzoferrato, A.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
84 KB
Volume
39
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9304

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


We investigated the cytotoxicity of different dental materials according to the study protocol adopted by our lab for the screening of new materials. Experimental parameters used in such testing are addressed mainly in documents EN 30993 ''Biological evaluation of medical devices, Part 5: Tests for cytotoxicity: in vitro methods'' and ''Biological evaluation of medical devices, Part 12: Sample preparation and reference materials.'' Cells were cultured in microplates and challenged with aqueous extracts of the materials. The assay methods were neutral red-and propidium iodideuptake assays, both indicative of cell viability and able to provide quantitative data. The observation of contrasting results for one material using the above-mentioned methods raised some concern about the assay system used. With further experimentation, it appeared that a sustained release of volatile substances still present in one extract exerted a toxic effect in neighboring cultures. It is concluded that in the microenvironment of a microplate the distribution of samples cannot be disregarded, as it may be responsible for toxicity cross-contamination. Moreover, the use of more than one single method has to be recommended in cytotoxicity testing, in order to avoid false positive results due to experimental artifacts.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A simple and fast two-locus quality cont
โœ Sang Hong Lee; Dale R. Nyholt; Stuart Macgregor; Anjali K. Henders; Krina T. Zon ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2010 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 328 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

The impact of erroneous genotypes having passed standard quality control (QC) can be severe in genome-wide association studies, genotype imputation, and estimation of heritability and prediction of genetic risk based on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). To detect such genotyping errors, a simpl