𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Extending Large Sets oft-Designs

✍ Scribed by S. Ajoodani-Namini


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1996
Tongue
English
Weight
278 KB
Volume
76
Category
Article
ISSN
0097-3165

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


A large set of disjoint S(*; t, k, v) designs, denoted by LS(*; t, k, v), is a partition of k-subsets of a v-set into S(*; t, k, v) designs. In this paper, we develop some recursive methods to construct large sets of t-designs. As an application, we construct infinite families of large sets of t-designs for all t. In particular, we show that if v=2 t&3 m&2, k=2 t&3 &1, and t, m 2, then a LS(( v&t k&t )Γ‚2; t, k, v) exists.

1996 Academic Press, Inc.

1. Introduction

Let v, k, t, and * be four positive integers such that v k t>0. We denote the set of i-subsets of a set X by P i (X).

A t-design S(*; t, k, v) is a pair (X, B) in which X is a finite set with cardinality v and B is a collection of elements of P k (X) such that every element of P t (X) appears exactly * times in B.

A large set of disjoint S(*; t, k, v) designs, denoted by LS(*; t, k, v), is a partition of the k-subsets of a v-set into S(*; t, k, v) designs. Obviously, if a LS(*; t, k, v) exists, then *=( v&t k&t )Γ‚n for some n. For the sake of simplicity, we write LS(1Γ‚n; t, k, v) instead of LS(( v&t k&t )Γ‚n; t, k, v). A well known necessary condition for the existence of a LS(1Γ‚n; t, k, v) is that n|( v&i k&i ) for i=0, ..., t. It is well known that in each of the following cases these conditions are also sufficient: (i) t=1, [2] (ii) t=2, k=3 and v{7, [3,[7][8][9][10][11][13][14][15] (iii) t=2, k 15 and n=2, [1, 4] (iv) t=3, k=4 and v#0 (mod 3), [13] (v) t=6, k=7 and n=2, [5,6,12] (vi) v=nl(t)+t and k=t+1 in which l(t) is defined recursively by l(i)=l(i&1) l.c.m.[1, ..., i+1] l.c.m.[( i j )| j=1, ..., i], l(0)=1 [12]. For t>6, designs of the last class together with their derived and residual designs are the only known designs.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


New large sets of t-designs
✍ Reinhard Laue; Spyros S. Magliveras; Alfred Wassermann πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 170 KB
A few more large sets of t-designs
✍ Yeow Meng Chee; Spyros S. Magliveras πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 176 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

We construct several new large sets of t-designs that are invariant under Frobenius groups, and discuss their consequences. These large sets give rise to further new large sets by means of known recursive constructions including an infinite family of large sets of 3 -(v, 4, Ξ») designs.

Some Infinite Families of Large Sets of
✍ B. Tayfeh-Rezaie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 98 KB

A set of necessary conditions for the existence of a large set of t-designs, LS[N] (t, k, v), is N |( v&i k&i ) for i=0, 1, ..., t. We show that these conditions are sufficient for N=3, t=2, 3, or 4, and k 8.

Some results on the existence of large s
✍ G. B. Khosrovshahi; R. Tayfeh-Rezaie πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 96 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract A set of trivial necessary conditions for the existence of a large set of __t__‐designs, __LS__[N](__t,k,__Ξ½), is $N\big | {{\nu \hskip -3.1 \nu}-i \choose k-i}$ for __i__ = 0,…,__t__. There are two conjectures due to Hartman and Khosrovshahi which state that the trivial necessary condi

New large sets of t-designs with prescri
✍ R. Laue; G. R. Omidi; B. Tayfeh-Rezaie; A. Wassermann πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 128 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract In this article, we investigate the existence of large sets of 3‐designs of prime sizes with prescribed groups of automorphisms PSL(2,__q__) and PGL(2,__q__) for __q__ < 60. We also construct some new interesting large sets by the use of the computer program DISCRETA. The results obtain

Extending Ο‰-consistent sets to maximally
✍ George Weaver; Michael Thau; Hugues Leblanc πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1990 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 168 KB

EXTENDING w-CONSISTENT SETS TO MAXIMALLY CONSISTENT, IN-COMPLETE SETS by GEORGE WEAVER in Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania MICHAEL THAU and HUGUES LEBLANC in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (U.S.A.) ') Given L, a first order language, HENKIN'S completeness proof for L proceeds by showing that every consistent se