𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Extended resection of fixed rectal cancer

✍ Scribed by Nathan W. Pearlman; Gregory V. Stiegmann; Robert E. Donohue


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
416 KB
Volume
63
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Between 1980 and 1987, we operated on 23 patients (16 men and 7 women) with fixed rectal cancer. Two patients had primary tumors. Twenty-one patients had recurrent disease (anterior resection, 8; abdominoperineal resection, 13). Eighteen patients had prior irradiation (40 Gy to 120 Gy). Resection was possible in 20 patients (16 for cure and 4 for palliation). Operations included extended proctectomy (n = 4), standard pelvic exenteration (n = 4), and sacropelvic exenteration (n = 12). One (5%) patient died postoperatively and five (25%) others had significant postoperative complications. With a follow-up time of 1 to 48+ months (median, 18 months), nine patients are dead of disease (operative death included), four are living with disease, two are dead free of disease, and eight (50% of those undergoing curative resection) are living free of disease. The results suggest that resection of fixed rectal cancer is feasible in many patients and of potential long-term benefit to approximately 50% of those in whom curative resection is possible.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Extended resections for advanced rectal
✍ R. D. Madoff πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 50 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Specialist teamwork required

Resection of β€˜inoperable’ rectal cancer
✍ Dr. R. D. James; P. F. Schofield πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1985 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 322 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## Abstract Forty-two patients with fixed inoperable adenocarcinoma of the rectum due to local extension in the pelvis have been treated using high dose radiotherapy followed by surgery when possible. Inoperability was determined initially by laparotomy in 15 patients and in the remainder by examin

Extended abdominoperineal resection with
✍ T. Holm; A. Ljung; T. HΓ€ggmark; G. Jurell; J. Lagergren πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2007 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 476 KB

## Abstract ## Background Intraoperative tumour perforation, positive tumour margins, wound complications and local recurrence are frequent difficulties with conventional abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal cancer. An alternative technique is the extended posterior perineal approach with g