Psychological assessment is a hybrid, both art and science. The empirical foundations of testing are indispensable in providing reliable and valid data. At the level of the integrated assessment, however, science gives way to art. Standards of reliability and validity account for the individual inst
Expertise, Domains, and the Consensual Assessment Technique
β Scribed by JAMES C. KAUFMAN; JOHN BAER; JASON C. COLE
- Publisher
- Creative Education Foundation
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 92 KB
- Volume
- 43
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-0175
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT) argues that the most valid judgments of the creativity are those of the combined opinions of experts in the field. Yet who exactly qualifies as an expert to evaluate a creative product such as a short story? This study examines both novice and expert judgments of student short fiction. Results indicate a need for caution in using non-expert raters. Although there was only a small (but statistically significant) difference between experts' and novices' mean ratings, the correlation between the two sets of ratings was just .71. Experts were also far more consistent in their ratings compared to novices, whose level of inter-rater reliability was potentially problematic.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract On October 9β11, 2003, the third meeting of the White Matter Study Group of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine was held in Venice, Italy. This article is the report of the meeting on how to use MRI in the diagnostic workup of multiple sclerosis (MS) and allied