𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity

✍ Scribed by Jariel A. Rendell; Matthew T. Huss; Maren L. Jensen


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
119 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0735-3936

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The effects of labelling, expert testimo
✍ Joel D. Lieberman; Daniel A. Krauss 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB

## Abstract Expert witnesses offering testimony in sexually violent predator civil commitment trials may use diagnostic labels that are either familiar (e.g. ‘psychopath’) or unfamiliar (e.g. ‘paraphilia’) to jurors. Using predictions based on cognitive experiential self‐theory, we explored the inf

Juror decision-making in a mock sexually
✍ Laura S. Guy; John F. Edens 📂 Article 📅 2003 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 150 KB 👁 3 views

## Abstract Despite widespread use of mental health testimony in cases where violence risk is at issue, relatively little is known about the impact of such information on juror decision‐making. This study addressed the effects of testimony based on three types of risk assessment instrument or metho

Plaintiff life-taking: the effect of moc
✍ Debra L. Worthington 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

## Abstract Social scientific and legal scholars have examined the potential of a variety of case‐relevant biases to distort juror decision‐making (__inter alia__, death penalty attitudes, attitudes toward corporations, attitudes toward physicians, etc.). However, previous research has yet to addre

‘The witness who saw, /he left little do
✍ Michael L. Perlin; Astrid Birgden; Kris Gledhill 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 152 KB

## Abstract The question of how courts assess expert evidence—especially when mental disability is an issue—raises the corollary question of whether courts adequately evaluate the content of the expert testimony or whether judicial decision making may be influenced by teleology (‘cherry picking’ ev