Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity
✍ Scribed by Jariel A. Rendell; Matthew T. Huss; Maren L. Jensen
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 119 KB
- Volume
- 28
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0735-3936
- DOI
- 10.1002/bsl.913
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Expert witnesses offering testimony in sexually violent predator civil commitment trials may use diagnostic labels that are either familiar (e.g. ‘psychopath’) or unfamiliar (e.g. ‘paraphilia’) to jurors. Using predictions based on cognitive experiential self‐theory, we explored the inf
## Abstract Despite widespread use of mental health testimony in cases where violence risk is at issue, relatively little is known about the impact of such information on juror decision‐making. This study addressed the effects of testimony based on three types of risk assessment instrument or metho
## Abstract Social scientific and legal scholars have examined the potential of a variety of case‐relevant biases to distort juror decision‐making (__inter alia__, death penalty attitudes, attitudes toward corporations, attitudes toward physicians, etc.). However, previous research has yet to addre
## Abstract The question of how courts assess expert evidence—especially when mental disability is an issue—raises the corollary question of whether courts adequately evaluate the content of the expert testimony or whether judicial decision making may be influenced by teleology (‘cherry picking’ ev