## Abstract The cement–bone interface plays an important role in load transfer between cemented implant systems and adjacent bone, but little is known about the micromechanical behavior of this interface following in vivo service. Small samples of postmortem‐retrieved cement–bone specimens from cem
Experimental micromechanics of the cement–bone interface
✍ Scribed by Kenneth A. Mann; Mark A. Miller; Richard J. Cleary; Dennis Janssen; Nico Verdonschot
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 248 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0736-0266
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Despite the widespread use of cement as a means of fixation of implants to bone, surprisingly little is known about the micromechanical behavior in terms of the local interfacial motion. In this work, we utilized digital image correlation techniques to quantify the micromechanics of the cement–bone interface of laboratory‐prepared cemented total hip replacements subjected to nondestructive, quasistatic tensile and compressive loading. Upon loading, the majority of the displacement response localized at the contact interface region between cement and bone. The contact interface was more compliant (p = 0.0001) in tension (0.0067 ± 0.0039 mm/MPa) than compression (0.0051 ± 0.0031 mm/MPa), and substantial hysteresis occurred due to sliding contact between cement and bone. The tensile strength of the cement–bone interface was inversely proportional to the compliance of the interface and proportional to the cement/bone contact area. When loaded beyond the ultimate strength, the strain localization process continued at the contact interface between cement and bone with microcracking (damage) to both. More overall damage occurred to the cement than to the bone. The opening and closing at the contact interface from loading could serve as a conduit for submicron size particles. In addition, the cement mantle is not mechanically supported by surrounding bone as optimally as is commonly assumed. Both effects may influence the longevity of the reconstruction and could be considered in preclinical tests. © 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 26:872–879, 2008
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract Recently, experiments were performed to determine the micromechanical behavior of the cement‐bone interface under tension‐compression loading conditions. These experiments were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA) to test whether the micromechanical response of the interface co
## Abstract Loss of fixation at the cement–bone interface is known to contribute to aseptic loosening, but little is known about the mechanical damage response of this interface. An in vitro study using cement–bone specimens subjected to shear fatigue loading was performed, and the progression of s
## Abstract Scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM) was used in the burst mode at 400 MHz, nominal lateral resolution 2.5 μm, to study the micromechanical properties of the dentin/adhesive interface. Corresponding specimens from the same tooth were investigated using μ Raman spectroscopy, light microsco
## Abstract Quantitative information regarding the interface strength and degree of cement penetration associated with cement viscosity during total hip arthroplasty is limited. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of the viscosity of bone cement at the time of implantation on t
## Abstract Loosening is recognized as one of the primary sources of total hip replacement (THR) failure. In this study the influence of the bone surface texture on loosening of the cement/bone interface was studied. Model cemented hip replacements were prepared and subjected to cyclic loads that i