This paper was devoted to the three-dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of inflatable beams. The beams under consideration are made of modern textile materials and can be used as a load-bearing beams or arches when inflated. A 3D Timoshenko beam with a homogeneous orthotropic woven fabric
Experimental characterization and finite element analysis of inflated fabric beams
โ Scribed by Christopher G. Malm; William G. Davids; Michael L. Peterson; Adam W. Turner
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 599 KB
- Volume
- 23
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0950-0618
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
An airbeam is a high-strength fabric sleeve with a highly flexible internal bladder that can be used as a load-bearing beam or arch when inflated. Due to their fabric construction, airbeams are inherently thinwalled structures that are prone to local buckling. In this study, airbeams were tested in bending at different inflation pressures to quantify their load-deformation response and the effect of inflation pressure on response. Tension-torsion tests of the airbeam fabric were conducted to estimate the fabric shear modulus, and the bend test results were used in conjunction with Timoshenko beam theory to estimate the fabric elastic modulus. Three-dimensional membrane finite element (FE) models were then used to predict the beam load-deformation response given these moduli. The FE models successfully predicted localized fabric buckling and softening of load-deflection response. Comparison of FE model-predicted load-deflection response with beam theory shows that conventional beam theory is accurate prior to local buckling of the airbeam fabric. The FE model and test results indicate that the consideration of work done by pressure under deformation-induced volume changes may increase beam capacity beyond previously derived theoretical limiting values.
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
The stiffness and mass matrices of a twisted beam element with linearly varying breadth and depth are derived. The angle of twist is assumed to vary linearly along the length of the beam. The effects of shear deformation and (otary inertia are considered in deriving the elemental matrices. The first