Experience Under Railway Labor Legislation
β Scribed by Leonard A. Lecht
- Publisher
- Columbia University Press
- Year
- 2019
- Tongue
- English
- Leaves
- 264
- Series
- Columbia Studies in the Social Sciences; 587
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Studies the relationship between the railway labor laws and the federal government to understand the postwar seizures of the railways by the federal government.
β¦ Table of Contents
Preface
Contents
Introduction
I. The Beginnings of Railway Labor Legislation
II. The Railroad Administration and the Railroad Labor Board
III. The Railway Labor Act of 1926
IV. Railway Collective Bargaining and the Railway Labor Act 1926 Through 1934
V. The 1934 Amendments
VI. Federal Full-Crew, Train-Limit, and Six-Hour-Day Legislation
VII. Consolidation and Job Protection
VIII. The Establishment of a Separate Railway Social Security System
IX. The Expansion of the Railway Social Security System
X. Collective Bargaining and the Railway Labor Act, 1935β1941
XI. Railway Labor Relations During World War II
XII. Railway Collective Bargaining Since World War II
XIII. The Diesel Movement
XIV. Changes in the Railway Labor Act After World War II
Table of Cases
Glossary
Bibliography
Index
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
<p>Studies the history and progress of international labor agreements, treaties, conventions and congresses, resulting in labor legislation with international validity or important international bearings.</p>
The book provides a clear assessment of the New Labour public policies and their outcomes in Britain under the leadership of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown from 1997-2009. Authors Florence Faucher-King and Patrick Le Galès argue that New Labour, in contrast to its European counterparts, developed a rig
<p>The book provides a clear assessment of the New Labour governments in Britain, when Tony Blair then Gordon Brown were Prime Ministers between 1997 and 2009. This assessment is based upon a review of implemented public policies and their outcomes instead of programmes or discourses.</p>