๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Exclusion of the oesophagus. Is this a dangerous manoeuvre?

โœ Scribed by R. Nambiar

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
270 KB
Volume
71
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

The pruritus of cholestasis is relieved
The pruritus of cholestasis is relieved by an opiate antagonist: Is this pruritus a centrally mediated phenomenon?
โœ J Heathcote ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 174 KB

tivity and specificity of EUS needs to be obtained. More 1116. studies are needed to clarify the specificity of EUS (97% 19. Del Santo P, Kazarian KK, Rogers JF, Bevins PA, Hall JR. Prevs. 87%) and to determine the sensitivity and specificdiction of operative cholangiography in patients undergoing e

Opposition to prescriptive authority: Is
Opposition to prescriptive authority: Is this a case of the tail wagging the dog?
โœ John Caccavale ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2002 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 79 KB

## Abstract This essay proposes that opposition to prescriptive authority (RxP) is not grounded in or based on any objective data. Opposition arguments fall into the category of ideology, opinion, and inappropriate economic beliefs. Moreover, what scant data does exist with respect to prescribing p