𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Excited states of GFP chromophore and active site studied by the SAC-CI method: Effect of protein-environment and mutations

✍ Scribed by Jun-Ya Hasegawa; Kazuhiro Fujimoto; Ben Swerts; Tomoo Miyahara; Hiroshi Nakatsuji


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2007
Tongue
English
Weight
441 KB
Volume
28
Category
Article
ISSN
0192-8651

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Excited states of fluorescent proteins were studied using symmetry‐adapted cluster‐configuration interaction (SAC‐CI) method. Protein‐environmental effect on the excitation and fluorescence energies was investigated. In green fluorescent protein (GFP), the overall protein‐environmental effect on the first excitation energy is not significant. However, glutamine (Glu) 94 and arginine (Arg96) have the red‐shift contribution as reported in a previous study (Laino et al., Chem Phys 2004, 298, 17). The excited states of GFP active site (GFP‐W22‐Ser205‐Glu222‐Ser65) were also calculated. Such large‐scale SAC‐CI calculations were performed with an improved code containing a new algorithm for the perturbation selection. The SAC‐CI results indicate that a charge‐transfer state locates at 4.19 eV, which could be related to the channel of the photochemistry as indicated in a previous experimental study. We also studied the excitation and fluorescence energies of blue fluorescent protein, cyan fluorescent protein, and Y66F. The SAC‐CI results are very close to the experimental ones. The protonation state of blue fluorescent protein was determined. Conformation of cyan fluorescent protein indicated by the present calculation agrees to the experimentally observed structure. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem, 2007


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Ground and excited states of Mg porphin
✍ J. Hasegawa; M. Hada; M. Nonoguchi; H. Nakatsuji 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 419 KB

The SAC (symmetry adapted cluster)/SAC-CI method is applied to the ground and excited states of magnesium porphin (MgP). The rr interaction between the Mg atom and the porphin ring is small and, therefore, the essential difference between MgP and free base porphin (FBP) lies in symmetry; the former