Examples of the use of rating scales in ergonomics research
β Scribed by D.J. Oborne
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1976
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 348 KB
- Volume
- 7
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0003-6870
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The majority of ergonomics investigations using rating scales employ either an analogue or a category type of scale. Both have their limitations. This paper discusses a method of combining the two scales to produce a valuable assessment tool for the ergonomist. Examples of its use in both laboratory and field situations are discussed, as are its limitations.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Two studies are reported which investigated how people interpret quantifiers of amount such as are commonly used in questionnaires and rating scales. The results indicated that the interpretation of certain quantifiers varied depending on the context in which they occurred. Low-magnitude quantifiers
## Objective: To validate the hamilton depression (17) and montgommery and asberg depression scales as research instruments in older depressed community residents. ## Design: External validation against gms/agecat case level in the recruitment of older community residents for an antidepressant tr
## Abstract The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of four widely used generic health status measures in Friedreich's ataxia (FA), to determine their suitability as outcome measures. Fiftyβsix people with genetically confirmed FA completed the Barthel Index (BI), Gen
## Abstract ## Objective To compare the reliability of three rating scales for assessing depressive symptoms in a communityβbased, nonβclinically depressed older population. ## Methods The study sample comprised of 302 independently living subjects aged 65 years or older. Depressive symptoms wer