Examining how advocacy groups build relationships on the Internet
✍ Scribed by Richard D. Waters; Meredith Lord
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2009
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 104 KB
- Volume
- 14
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1465-4520
- DOI
- 10.1002/nvsm.354
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In 2006, the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (AETA) became American law after brief Congressional discussions despite the public outcries from animal rights organizations. The AETA made it a federal terrorist crime to harm any animal enterprise financially, which could include legal forms of protests and boycotts. Members of the “Stop AETA” coalition failed to draw attention to the legislation. The relationship management theory of public relations provides a framework to determine how well the coalition members developed relationships with like‐minded individuals and the media. Results from a content analysis of the coalition members' Web sites revealed that nonprofit organizations and citizen‐advocacy groups attempted to develop relationships through a variety of strategies, including making the visit a positive experience, being open and transparent in their advocacy efforts, and providing access to coalition leaders. The results suggest that the coalition was unable to generate much news coverage for the issue because coalition members did not sufficiently reach out to cultivate relationships with journalists. Specific suggestions are provided for future advocacy groups to use the Internet to develop and cultivate relationships with key stakeholder groups.
Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES