## Abstract Haplotypes incorporate more information about the underlying polymorphisms than do genotypes for individual SNPs, and are considered as a more informative format of data in association analysis. To model haplotypes requires high degrees of freedom, which could decrease power and limit a
Evolutionary-based association analysis using haplotype data
✍ Scribed by Howard Seltman; Kathryn Roeder; B. Devlin
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 146 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0741-0395
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Association studies, both family‐based and population‐based, can be powerful means of detecting disease‐liability alleles. To increase the information of the test, various researchers have proposed targeting haplotypes. The larger number of haplotypes, however, relative to alleles at individual loci, could decrease power because of the additional degrees of freedom required for the test. An optimal strategy would focus the test on particular haplotypes or groups of haplotypes, much as is done with cladistic‐based association analysis. First suggested by Templeton et al. ([1987] Genetics 117:343–351), such analyses use the evolutionary relationships among haplotypes to produce a limited set of hypothesis tests and to increase the interpretability of these tests. To more fully utilize the information contained in the evolutionary relationships among haplotypes and in the sample, we propose generalized linear models (GLM) for the analysis of data from family‐based and population‐based studies. These models fully account for haplotype phase ambiguity and allow for covariates. The models are encoded into a software package (the Evolutionary‐Based Haplotype Analysis Package, EHAP), which also provides for various kinds of exploratory data analysis. The exploratory analyses, such as error checking, estimation of haplotype frequencies, and tools for building cladograms, should facilitate the implementation of cladistic‐based association analysis with haplotypes. Genet Epidemiol 25:48–58, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract In haplotype‐based association studies for late onset diseases, one attractive design is to use available unaffected spouses as controls (Valle et al. [1998] Diab. Care 21:949–958). Given cases and spouses only, the standard expectation‐maximization (EM) algorithm (Dempster et al. [1977
## Abstract Exploring the associations between haplotypes and disease phenotypes is an important step toward the discovery of genes that influence complex human diseases. When unrelated subjects are sampled, haplotypes are often ambiguous because of the unknown gametic phase of the measured sites a
## Abstract The completion of the HapMap Project and the development of high‐throughput single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping technologies have greatly enhanced the prospects of identifying and characterizing the genetic variants that influence complex traits. In principle, association analysis
## Abstract The haplotype‐sharing correlation (HSC) method for association analysis using family data is revisited by introducing a permutation procedure for estimating region‐wise significance at each marker on a study segment. In simulation studies, the HSC method has a correct type 1 error rate
## Abstract Related individuals collected for use in linkage studies may be used in case‐control linkage disequilibrium analysis, provided one takes into account correlations between individuals due to identity‐by‐descent (IBD) sharing. We account for these correlations by calculating a weight for