𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Evolution of somatosensory and motor cortex in primates

✍ Scribed by Kaas, Jon H.


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2004
Tongue
English
Weight
268 KB
Volume
281A
Category
Article
ISSN
0003-276X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Inferences about how the complex somatosensory systems of anthropoid primates evolved are based on comparative studies of such systems in extant mammals. Experimental studies of members of the major clades of extant mammals suggest that somatosensory cortex of early mammals consisted of only a few areas, including a primary area, S1, bordered by strip‐like rostral and caudal somatosensory fields, SR and SC. In addition, the second somatosensory area, S2, and the parietal ventral area, PV, were probably present. S1, S2, and PV were activated independently via parallel projections from the ventroposterior nucleus, VP. Little posterior parietal cortex existed, and it was unlikely that a separate primary motor area, M1, existed until placental mammals evolved. Early primates retained this basic organization and also had a larger posterior parietal region that mediated sensorimotor functions via connections with motor and premotor areas. The frontal cortex included M1, dorsal and ventral premotor areas, supplementary motor area, and cingulate motor fields. Ventroposterior superior and ventroposterior inferior nuclei were distinct from the ventroposterior nucleus in the thalamus. In early anthropoid primates, areas S1, SR, and SC had differentiated into the fields now recognized as areas 3b, 3a, and 1. Areas 3b and 1 contained parallel mirror‐image representations of cutaneous receptors and a parallel representation in area 2 was probable. Serial processing became dominant, so that neurons in areas 1, S2, and PV became dependent on area 3b for activation. Posterior parietal cortex expanded into more areas that related to frontal cortex. Less is known about changes that might have occurred with the emergence of apes and humans, but their brains were larger and posed scaling problems most likely solved by increasing the number of cortical areas and reducing the proportion of long connections. Β© 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Motor and somatosensory evoked potential
✍ D.L.J. Tavy; H. Franssen; R.W.M. Keunen; A.R. Wattendorff; R.E.M. Hekster; A.C. πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 108 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

To assess whether electrophysiological tests are of use in differentiating between patients with asymptomatic cervical stenosis and patients with clinical evidence of myelopathy, we studied motor evoked potentials (MEPs) to magnetic brain stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in pat

Motor cortex and hand motor skills: Stru
✍ Katrin Amunts; Gottfried Schlaug; Lutz JΓ€ncke; Helmuth Steinmetz; Axel Schleiche πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 157 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

Recent studies in humans and nonhuman primates have shown that the functional organization of the human sensorimotor cortex changes following sensory stimulation or following the acquisition of motor skills. It is unknown whether functional plasticity in response to the acquisition of new motor skil