Evolution of multi-criteria analysis: a scientometric analysis
β Scribed by B. Urli; R. Nadeau
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 144 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1057-9214
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The field of multi-criteria analysis has known very important developments during the last 20 years, if one considers the very large amount of activities that it has generated and continues to generate (papers in journals, a dedicated journal, books, meetings, applications, . . . ). Even if multi-criteria analysis has reached some maturity, its future is subject to questions and debate among its researchers: what is the evolution of the field? What is its structure? Is it integrating new topics? In order to answer such questions at least partially, we have studied multi-criteria analysis literature by means of the method of associated words (scientometric analysis) and the software 'Leximappe'. All the abstracts of the papers which are relative to multi-criteria analysis and are included in the bibliographic ABI-INFORM database from 1985 to 1996 have been analysed. In this paper, we will present some results of this study.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
This paper reports on a workshop on Problem Formulation in Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis held at SPUDM97. The focus of the workshop was the problem formulation phase which occurs between the analyst meeting a person with a 'mess' and the time he or she begins to analyse a structured problem with
## Abstract A sensitivity study of the subsurface flow component of the physically based distributed modelling system SHETRAN using data from a small Mediterranean mountain catchment is presented. The parameter space sampled was based on ranges of parameter values measured in field experiments. Mod
## ABSTRACT Since multiple criteria characterise many practical decision problems, the research field of multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) is flourishing. This paper compares the multiβattribute decision making (MADM) methods, simple additive rating (SAR), simple additive weighting (SAW) as we
This paper discusses the paradigm of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA), and relates it to other disciplines. It concludes that MCDA needs a larger, not smaller, emphasis on values and subjectivity to increase rationality in decision-making. The paper bases the argument on a conciliation of et