There appears to be an almost universal commitment among science educators to promote the goal of student understanding of the nature of science. Recent disagreements among philosophers of science and between philosophers and other groups such as scientists and science educators about the nature of
Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education
β Scribed by John L. Rudolph; Jim Stewart
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 70 KB
- Volume
- 35
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-4308
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Research in the teaching and learning of evolutionary biology has revealed persistent difficulties in student understanding of fundamental Darwinian concepts. These difficulties may be traced, in part, to science instruction that is based on philosophical conceptions of science that are no longer viewed as adequately characterizing the diverse nature of scientific practice, especially in evolutionary biology. This mismatch between evolution as practiced and the nature of science as perceived by researchers and educators has a long history extending back to the publication of Darwin's theory of natural selection. An examination of how this theory was received by the scientific community of the time may provide insight into some of the difficulties that students have today in learning these important biological concepts. The primary difficulties center around issues of metaphysics and scientific method, aspects of the nature of science too often ignored in science education. Our intent is not to offer a specific course of action to remedy the problems educators currently face, but rather to suggest an alternative path one might take to eventually reach a solution. That path, we argue, should include the use of broader models of science that incorporate these elements of scientific practice to structure teaching and education research in evolution.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
A brief review is given of the development of modern sciences from the early 1800s to the establishment of modern quantum theory around 1925 leading to modern theoretical chemical physics. Special attention is given to the interplay between mathematics, physics, and chemistry and to show how the dev
## Abstract In a series of publications beginning in the 1960s, Neel and colleagues suggested that genetically nonrandom, or βlinealβ, population fissions contributed to genetic structure in ancient human groups. The authors reached this conclusion by studying the genetic consequences of village fi
Milne (1998) has suggested the importance of examining the stories that are found in science textbooks for their philosophical assumptions about science. Of the kinds of stories she has identified are examples of those she calls "heroic." She notes that many such stories may be myths and are often s