This article describes recent research on counterfactual reasoning in causal judgment and details implications for future research on consumer and managerial decisions. Two types of counterfactual reasoning may be employed in causal judgment, one of which involves outcome contrasts, and is used to g
β¦ LIBER β¦
Evidence for deductive reasoning in blocking of causal judgments
β Scribed by Chris J. Mitchell; Peter F. Lovibond; Maria Condoleon
- Book ID
- 113775425
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2005
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 156 KB
- Volume
- 36
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0023-9690
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Counterfactual reasoning in causal judgm
β
Ann L. McGill
π
Article
π
2000
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 103 KB
π 2 views
Children's causal inferences from indire
β
David M. Sobel; Joshua B. Tenenbaum; Alison Gopnik
π
Article
π
2004
π
Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
π
English
β 184 KB
Childrenβs causal inferences from indire
β
David M Sobel; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Alison Gopnik
π
Article
π
2004
π
Wiley (Blackwell Publishing)
π
English
β 189 KB
Previous research suggests that children can infer causal relations from patterns of events. However, what appear to be cases of causal inference may simply reduce to children recognizing relevant associations among events, and responding based on those associations. To examine this claim, in Experi
fMRI Evidence for a Three-Stage Model of
β
Fangmeier, Thomas; Knauff, Markus; Ruff, Christian C.; Sloutsky, Vladimir
π
Article
π
2006
π
MIT Press
π
English
β 460 KB
No Evidence for Blocking in Human Judgme
β
Phil Reed
π
Article
π
1996
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 89 KB
Further evidence for the role of inferen
β
Stefaan Vandorpe; Jan De Houwer; Tom Beckers
π
Article
π
2005
π
Psychonomic Society Publications
π
English
β 124 KB