Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews
โ Scribed by Barbara Ann Kitchenham (Author); David Budgen (Author); Pearl Brereton (Author)
- Publisher
- Chapman and Hall/CRC
- Year
- 2015
- Leaves
- 426
- Edition
- 1
- Category
- Library
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
โฆ Synopsis
In the decade since the idea of adapting the evidence-based paradigm for software engineering was first proposed, it has become a major tool of empirical software engineering. Evidence-Based Software Engineering and Systematic Reviews provides a clear introduction to the use of an evidence-based model for software engineering research and practice.
โฆ Table of Contents
The Evidence-Based Paradigm. Evidence-Based Software Engineering (EBSE). Planning a Review. Forms of Secondary Study. Searching for Primary Studies. Study Selection. Assess Study Quality. Extract Study Data. Synthesis. Knowledge Translation. Controlled Experiments. Controlled Quasi-Experiments. Case Studies. Surveys. Qualitative studies. Replication.
โฆ Subjects
Computer Science;Computation;Software Engineering & Systems Development
๐ SIMILAR VOLUMES
This book discusses what is currently known about software engineering, based on an analysis of all the publicly available data. This aim is not as ambitious as it sounds, because there is not a great deal of data publicly available. The intent is to provide material that is useful to professional
Evidence-based practice (EBP) promises to have a profound impact on social work practice, education, and scholarship, but adopting EBP depends on the availability and accessibility of evidence and on strategies to synthesize this information. Systematic reviews provide a comprehensive, unbiased meth
This comprehensive resource offers professionals detailed guidance on the engineering aspects of building software for wireless communications. From design and architecture to security and testing, the book shows how to overcome every engineering challenge encountered in successfully developing wire
For many healthcare professionals there is a mystery surrounding systematic reviews of healthcare literature. How did they select certain studies and reject others? What did they do to pool results? How did a bunch of insignificant findings suddenly become significant? With this book you will embark