These two studies integrate self-enhancement and ingroup bias and analyse the phenomena from the social identity theory and self-categorization theory. In Study 1, the subjects (N=181) evaluated supporters of two presidential candidates on a rating scale. In Study 2, the subjects (N=302) evaluated e
β¦ LIBER β¦
Evaluative bias and self-enhancement among gender groups
β Scribed by Marjaana Lindeman; Lilli Sundvik
- Book ID
- 102831214
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1995
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 861 KB
- Volume
- 25
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Ingroup bias, self-enhancement and group
β
MARJAANA LINDEMAN
π
Article
π
1997
π
John Wiley and Sons
π
English
β 185 KB
Temptation Bias: Can Self-enhancement Li
β
Sheila Garos; Annette S. Kluck; James K. Beggan; Jeffrey Martindale; Amanda East
π
Article
π
2007
π
Springer US
π
English
β 305 KB
Idiographic Self-Evaluation and Bias
β
Rashmi R. Sinha; Joachim Krueger
π
Article
π
1998
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 128 KB
From Nutrition to Aspirations and Self-E
β
Dercon, Stefan; Singh, Abhijeet
π
Article
π
2013
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 281 KB
Academic Gender Bias and Women's Behavio
β
Julie R. Ancis; Susan D. Phillips
π
Article
π
1996
π
American Counseling Association
π
English
β 419 KB
The relationship between academic gender bias and female students' agentic self-efficacy expectations was examined. Agentic self-efficacy expectations was defined as an individual's beliefs about her ability to successfully engage in proactive educational and career facilitative behaviors. Participa
Building blocks of bias: Gender composit
β
Tessa V. West; Madeline E. Heilman; Lindy Gullett; Corinne A. Moss-Racusin; Joe
π
Article
π
2012
π
Elsevier Science
π
English
β 365 KB