## Abstract __Helicobacter pylori__ is a highly motile bacterium with multiple unipolar flagella, and it produces the urease enzyme. The flagella and urease are the virulence factors of __H. pylori__. __H. pylori__ often establishes a chronic infection in the stomach that may lead to gastric and du
Evaluation of urinary rapid test for Helicobacter pylori in general practice
✍ Scribed by Toru Fujisawa; Taimei Kaneko; Toshiko Kumagai; Taiji Akamatsu; Tsutomu Katsuyama; Kendo Kiyosawa; Tetsuya Tachikawa; Osamu Kosaka; Fusaichi Machikawa
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 42 KB
- Volume
- 15
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0887-8013
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
There is increasing interest in noninvasive tests for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection. One such test, a urine‐based rapid test kit (RAPIRUN H. pylori Antibody, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) for detection of antibody to H. pylori, has been developed and is considered ideal. In addition to its noninvasiveness and safe handling—due to use of urine as a sample—the assay procedure used for the urinary rapid test is very simple. Only 10–20 minutes are required to complete an assay, and no instruments are needed. The aim of this study was to examine the clinical usefulness of this urine‐based rapid test. A total of 189 patients, including 76 patients with gastroduodenal disease, were recruited. A pair of random single‐void urine and serum samples was collected from each of the 189 patients, and antibody to H. pylori in the urine and serum samples was measured using the urine‐based rapid test kit and three commercially available serum‐based ELISA kits. For the patients with gastroduodenal disease, invasive diagnostic methods using endoscopic biopsy specimens such as culture, histology, and rapid urease test were also performed. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the urinary rapid test were evaluated on the basis of the three serum ELISA results or the invasive diagnostic results. In addition, various urinalyses were performed, and the effects of substances existing in urine on the urinary rapid test results were examined. Of the 189 patients, the urinary rapid test was positive for 110 (58.2%), negative for 78 (41.3%), and invalid for only one patient (0.5%). Based on the three serum‐based ELISA results, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the urinary rapid test were 93.7, 88.9, and 92.2%, respectively. On the basis of the biopsy‐based test results, the sensitivity of the urinary rapid test was 100% and its accuracy (95.2%) was equivalent or superior to that of each serum‐based ELISA. In addition, no significant differences were observed between groups positive and negative on urinary rapid testing in any urinalysis parameter examined. The novel urinary rapid test kit evaluated in this study enables simple, rapid, and accurate diagnosis of H. pylori infection, and is an ideal test method for point‐of‐care testing. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 15:154–159, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Reliable microbiological tests are needed for the identification of bacteria. A program has been written in QuickBasic to identify such tests by using a formula that is based on Gyllenberg's Sum of C(i) and Gyllenberg's Rank R(i). A total of 139 papers on a newly isolated bacterium, Helicobacter pyl
Numerous detection methods for Helicobacter Pylori (H. pylori) have been developed with varying degrees of purported diagnostic utility. We have developed a rapid nonradioactive in situ hybridization (ISH) method for H. pylori detection in paraffin-embedded tissue and assessed its relative diagnosti